Replies

In The New Yorker magazine, profiles of urban girls/women in the NYC’s welfare system typically note, “Kayla got pregnant with her first child when she was fifteen.” Fifty percent of the time, the article will mention the baby's father, then describe how and why he drifted out of the picture; fifty percent of the time, there's no mention of the baby's father at all. After the first baby is born, it's as of every subsequent pregnancy is caused by an air-born virus. You'll be reading the article, reading about how Kayla was taking a job-training course, for example, and there will be a matter-of-fact note, “Two months after she turned seventeen, Julia gave birth to twins.” You , the reader, look up from the magazine and say — actually say, even if you are sitting alone in your apartment, drinking a Diet Coke - “Gave birth to twins? How the devil did that happen?”

For too long people have assumed our ghetto folk having children young was because of ignorance and/or lack of availability of birth control. The simple truth is that this is the “career” these young women pursue - a professional parasite on the taxpayers’ backs. As they near high school graduation, they are looking at a situation where they will no longer qualify to provide benefits for the welfare sow that bred them. In order to set up a new nest, she must have a baby; getting a job/learning a profession or trade is unthinkable - she has no skills or education. She breeds a “golden ticket welfare bastard” and the cycle starts again; she gets her own apartment, food stamps, cash benefits, Obamaphone, free college if she wants it, etc. The only change over 50 years of this lunacy is the drop in birthrate; one bastard will suffice.

Flooding the ghetto schools with birth control accomplished nothing; nobody wanted it, though they all understood its purpose.