Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

F18s compatible with Indian naval carrier fleet: Boeing
IANS ^ | August 28, 2017

Posted on 08/28/2017 5:22:38 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Global defence equipment major Boeing on Monday said that its F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter aircraft is compatible with India's current naval carrier platforms and that they can be produced in the country under the government's "Make in India" initiative.

"Analytical and (computer) simulations have shown that the F/A-18 is compatible with the current carrier fleet of the Indian Navy. The results of the test have been submitted in response to a global RFI issued by the Navy," said Pratyush Kumar, President, Boeing India.

Presently, the Indian Navy's aircraft carriers' utilise "ski-jump ramps" for fighter aircraft to take-off.

Kumar spoke to IANS on the sidelines of a briefing over F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter aircraft which was held here. Boeing has filed its response to a global RFI (request for information) floated by the Indian Navy earlier this year.

Boeing is considered to be one of the major contenders for the supply of 57 carrier-borne fighter aircraft required by the Indian Navy. Company executives told IANS that the F/A-18 Super Hornet was designed for carrier operations and is "the world's pre-eminent carrier capable aircraft" with a defined US Navy flight plan to outpace threats into the 2040s.

The Indian Navy initiated the bid and issued a "RFI for Procurement of Multi-Role Carrier Borne Fighter for The Indian Navy" on January 31, 2017.

According to Kumar, apart from the advanced technologies, the aircraft comes with an overall life cycle cost which is more reasonable than other contenders in the bid.

"The overall life cycle cost is far lower than others," Kumar said. "The Super Hornet has the lowest cost per flight hour which is even lower than Lockheed Martin's F-16."

Dan Gillian, Vice President of F/A-18 and EA Programmes, Boeing, observed that a platform like the "Super Hornet" under the "Make in India" programme will help the Indian industry to position itself for the manufacture of "Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft" (AMCA).

"Boeing can provide the capability needed for the Indian Navy to build its next generation carrier air wing. It can also provide the industrial base right here behind that capability," Gillian said.

"When we look across the globe at quality, capability and cost - India is an obvious partner. We have been building F/A-18 aerostructures and assemblies in India because it makes good business sense to do so."

"The Super Hornet represents 21st century capability for the Indian defence forces, and industrial capability where we have evaluated 400 suppliers for the fighter campaign and have done a deep assessment on the capability of over 160 Indian suppliers," Kumar said. "We have quadrupled our sourcing from India and currently source $1 billion from India."

Gillian mentioned that the Super Hornet is ahead of its competitors because of its affordability, survivability, built-in stealth, smarter weapons and being combat proven.

Currently, the Indian Navy has two aircraft carriers -- INS Vikramaditya and INS Viraat -- which are based in the Indian Ocean Region. It operates the Russian built MIG 29-K fighter aircraft from these platforms.

--IANS

rv/bg


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; boeing; f18; india; navair

1 posted on 08/28/2017 5:22:38 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I thought they were too big for the elevators, though....??


2 posted on 08/28/2017 5:24:14 AM PDT by Enchante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Amusing that the Chinese and Indians think that you can build carriers, obtain planes and suddenly you have effective warships. What they lack and cannot get is ninety years of naval warfare experience off platforms at sea much of it in combat. Its that accumulated experience, skilled and experienced crews that makes those ships functional.


3 posted on 08/28/2017 5:32:03 AM PDT by allendale (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

anddddddd, exactly how are they to get experience?


4 posted on 08/28/2017 5:39:08 AM PDT by null and void (I don't expect to live in a safe world. I expect to live in a free country. Respect the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

It’s about 9 ft. shorter and 4 feet narrower than an Su-33, so it should fit.


5 posted on 08/28/2017 5:39:38 AM PDT by Freeport (The proper application of high explosives will remove all obstacles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: allendale

That’s true. They however will not need 90 years to catch up. The big question is how effective/efficient that learning will be.


6 posted on 08/28/2017 5:40:51 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

If the launching aircraft are going to settle 15m how close is that to the sea surface? What happens in unfavorable wind conditions? (eg. gusty/variable) What about rough sea states where the swells are coming up to meet you and the bow is pitching down? Seems like there may not be much margin for error here.


7 posted on 08/28/2017 5:50:09 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Doing my part to help make America great again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

“Good judgement comes from experience; and a lot of that experience comes from bad judgement.” Will Rogers.


8 posted on 08/28/2017 5:56:35 AM PDT by VietVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Great! Another outsourcing opportunity!!! /sarc


9 posted on 08/28/2017 6:01:16 AM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VietVet

Yes, a lot of good men will pay the price in blood for their successors’ successes.


10 posted on 08/28/2017 6:05:43 AM PDT by null and void (I don't expect to live in a safe world. I expect to live in a free country. Respect the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

We could definitely have worse allies.


11 posted on 08/28/2017 6:06:22 AM PDT by null and void (I don't expect to live in a safe world. I expect to live in a free country. Respect the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: null and void

oh wait, we do...


12 posted on 08/28/2017 6:06:42 AM PDT by null and void (I don't expect to live in a safe world. I expect to live in a free country. Respect the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

If the U.S. is serious about helping India gain carrier expertise, we would invite the Indian naval attache, stationed in D.C. to observe carrier ops for a while, and bring a group of his naval aviators along to absorb as much as possible. There is a big difference between reading about, observing it, and doing it yourself. We could help with the second step and then invite them to participate in the third step aboard one of our ships.


13 posted on 08/28/2017 6:23:27 AM PDT by Pecos (A Constitutional republic shouldnÂ’t need to hold its collective breath in fear of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
They however will not need 90 years to catch up.

Actually, given India's multiple levels of government bureaucracy, they might need 90 years just to make up their minds on procuring the F/A-18.
14 posted on 08/28/2017 6:54:55 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pecos
If the U.S. is serious about helping India gain carrier expertise, we would invite the Indian naval attache, stationed in D.C. to observe carrier ops for a while, and bring a group of his naval aviators along to absorb as much as possible. There is a big difference between reading about, observing it, and doing it yourself. We could help with the second step and then invite them to participate in the third step aboard one of our ships.

India has been involved in carrier aviation for over 50 years. They don't need U.S. help in gaining expertise.

15 posted on 08/28/2017 6:57:15 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"We have been building F/A-18 aerostructures and assemblies in India because it makes good business sense to do so."

Yet another example of our critical military components coming from somewhere other than the US. Congress critters love to brag about how defense contracts provide good jobs for Americans but never mention the fact that critical components are made wherever the manufacturer can benefit the most from labor arbitrage.

We can't even produce our aircraft without relying on one or more of the people DoD tells us is an enemy to one degree or another. Shutting down all US based production of small arms ammunition will be the next step so the gun grabbers can regulate and tax as imports the ammo anyone except the government buys.

But hey, the labor is cheaper there so the "invisible hand" fisting you whether you like it or not is a good thing.

JMHo

16 posted on 08/28/2017 8:06:45 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Do you want to store the planes away, or fly them?


17 posted on 08/28/2017 7:07:18 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Winter is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

Umm, both.


18 posted on 08/28/2017 8:49:22 PM PDT by Enchante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson