Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

My article posted today as an attorney who worked on the case analyzing President Donald Trump's pardon of Sheriff Joe Arpaio last Friday

---------------------------------------------------

Specifically, Arpaio’s deputies only stopped people when there was probable cause, such as a traffic violation or other state-law crime. If someone was stopped by deputies for a legitimate reason, and if it also appeared that they were illegal aliens, the Sheriff’s office contacted ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) to take over from there.

But the ACLU claimed—and Judge G. Murray Snow found—that if Arpaio held anyone one minute longer than necessary to process their violation of state law for the additional reason of enforcing immigration law (i.e., holding them for ICE), then the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office violated their civil rights. Even if they were illegal aliens, Snow ruled, Arpaio detaining them to hand them over to ICE was illegal because only the federal government can do that. (And under Bush then Obama the federal government didn’t want to do it.)

One complaint was that someone might be held for investigation who is a U.S. citizen. So what? If my car looked like a car involved in a nearby hit-and-run accident, do you really think the police can’t stop me and hold me to see if I was involved in the hit-and-run? The police can hold a U.S. citizen on probable cause to investigate a possible crime.

And, of course, the ACLU claimed that Arpaio’s office “must have” decided based on racial appearance—for which there was not one shred of evidence. In fact, many of the actual deputies involved were Hispanic themselves.

1 posted on 08/28/2017 6:47:07 AM PDT by Moseley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Moseley
Another good article on the case: RINOS Wrong on Arpaio
2 posted on 08/28/2017 6:52:55 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Another great decision by Trump, the list is long at all the progress in just 7 months.


3 posted on 08/28/2017 6:58:13 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley
Judge Snow’s brother-in-law is a partner in the law firm assisting the ACLU, Covington & Burling (where Eric Holder and Lanny Breuer are partners).

Judge Snow ordered Maricopa County taxpayers to pay $4 million to Covington & Burling.

Funneling millions of dollars of taxpayer funds to his brother-in-law’s law firm is a serious conflict of interest.

4 posted on 08/28/2017 7:03:50 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

And let us not forget Speaker Ryan, who the know it all, was a real piece of shi! by bad mouth President Trump for the pardon.


6 posted on 08/28/2017 7:33:11 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley
Masterful, Mr. Moseley.

(Alliteration inevitable and unintended.)

(And I offer apologies--above is irrelevant assonance.)

7 posted on 08/28/2017 7:34:55 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

THanks for your insight. In addition to the legal reasons, we know that fundamental fairness is something President Trump believes very strongly in, and the simple laymans version is, in trying to punish him for doing his job, Sheriff Joe was treated unfairly.


8 posted on 08/28/2017 7:35:45 AM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

I thought that a State may choose to assist in enforcing Federal law but could not be compelled to do so.


9 posted on 08/28/2017 7:45:08 AM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

In summary, Sherriff Joe was railroaded by unethical, liberal lawyers, including the judge in the case.

JoMa


10 posted on 08/28/2017 7:51:12 AM PDT by joma89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Thank you.


11 posted on 08/28/2017 7:53:28 AM PDT by Ray76 (Republicans are a Democrat party front group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Trump should go nuclear on leftist judges and juries. His staff should search out wrong anti-constitutional convictions, and commute sentences by the thousands (if that many can be found).


13 posted on 08/28/2017 9:28:44 AM PDT by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

Excellent points. It looks like there were four separate reasons for the judge to recuse himself.


14 posted on 08/28/2017 9:34:44 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Moseley

The author missed one additional reason: Arpaio was denied a jury trial. That, alone, was judicial misconduct.


16 posted on 08/28/2017 9:49:02 AM PDT by CodeToad (Victorious warriors WIN first, then go to war! Go TRUMP!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson