Although a princess by marriage she was no princess in her life. It was all a facade. Her husband Charles was and is far worse than she. She was but 19 when she married and was really a victim.
Her sons became brave warriors in the service of their great nation. They acquitted themselves with honor in battle. I would far rather William on the throne than his father.
An amusing aside about Prince Charles: He was being interviewed by the BBC and was asked if he got any special privileges on board ship as he was in the Royal Navy. He paused a few seconds and said, “I get to have a picture of my Mum on the wall in the galley.”
I do not particularly like Charles but he does have a keen sense of humor and wit.
There is a RUMOR that Charles is secretly Muslim.
“And head of the Church of England..?!?!!!?!?”
Yes.
It's my understating that she came from a very wealthy,titled.family.Particularly if that's correct she should have been warned by her parents,siblings,etc of the "royal" tradition of kings and future kings having a roaming eye.A horrible tradition to be sure but tradition nevertheless.
Also,I think I recall having read that she was fooling around too.If true that kind of colors things a bit.
A victim? Yah,a victim of a horrible car accident.Other than that I don't see anything exceptional here.
Many people don't know that Mother Teresa died within a few days of Diana.She was a woman who was worthy of a billion times more respect than Diana yet many people...many Brits...have never even heard of her.
Charles rants about climate change really tick me off—if that clown cared about the planet he would take his carbon footprint to zero and off himself.