Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolutionists Tripping Over Human Tracks on Crete
Creation-Evolution Headlines ^ | September 4, 2017 | David F. Coppedge

Posted on 09/05/2017 8:27:10 AM PDT by fishtank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: ClearCase_guy

Evolution came of age with elitists when no one was around to travel the world and challenging their science. We have clearly seen the elitists in action on global warming. Even when proven false, they persist.
Fraud science then and now. Can’t we move on to something more important than this?


41 posted on 09/05/2017 11:35:39 AM PDT by momincombatboots (White Stetsons up.. let's save our country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

“evolution and the Bible are NOT incompatible”

They are incompatible if in fact evolution is false.


42 posted on 09/05/2017 11:37:13 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Thank you.

And the responses you got to your comment is exactly why I avoid these threads.


43 posted on 09/05/2017 11:38:38 AM PDT by LaRueLaDue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
They are incompatible if in fact evolution is false.

Evolution isn't false. All you need to do is look at your feet and hands to know it isn't.

44 posted on 09/05/2017 12:03:48 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
Evolution isn't "False" ... it's just not what some people believe/claim it to be (the evolutionists.)

Evolution also doesn't disprove the Bible, in fact often times it confirms it. How can evolution be false if it confirms the Bible?

45 posted on 09/05/2017 12:06:19 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Is that macro or micro-evolution?

We can watch micro-evolution happen, with plenty of examples (legs getting longer/shorter, etc. just look at dog breeding). The evolution of new species with different chromosomes is a different story. I don’t believe we have any viable *theories* outside of “with enough time”, which has also been shown to be problematic.


46 posted on 09/05/2017 12:16:56 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: HangThemHigh

More tracks and best idea, find a fossil of the hominid on Crete. There was a different climate then but then it’s always changing.


47 posted on 09/05/2017 12:31:05 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic

You mean during the period before the strain of bacteria reverts back to wild-type?


48 posted on 09/05/2017 12:44:50 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic

Dog breeding shows evidence of change within a species, which is unrelated to the ultimate claim of evolution theory.


49 posted on 09/05/2017 12:46:21 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

I’d much prefer to see evidence of one species developing into another.


50 posted on 09/05/2017 12:46:36 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
I’d much prefer to see evidence of one species developing into another.

Never happened (to the best of my knowledge.) Evolution within a species happens all the time.

51 posted on 09/05/2017 12:58:44 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

That’s fine, but remember—when you see a discussion about evolution in this sort of context, it’s referring to the traditional definition of evolution which claims a process involving mutation, natural selection and speciation.


52 posted on 09/05/2017 1:06:26 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Oh I understand what you’re saying. I tend to steer clear of those discussions here on FR because there’s just no reasoning with anyone who believes that mutations involving the transformation of one species into something completely different can happen.


53 posted on 09/05/2017 1:46:11 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Cretins!!!


54 posted on 09/05/2017 2:29:17 PM PDT by TravellerVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deplorable American1776

Innagadda' da-Creta' baby

55 posted on 09/05/2017 3:05:00 PM PDT by BlueDragon (..and that's the thing do you recognize the bells of truth when you hear them ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TravellerVA

Haha!

56 posted on 09/05/2017 3:14:00 PM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

“Evolution within a species happens all the time.”

Which is really just engineered adaptability.


57 posted on 09/05/2017 3:15:00 PM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Theo

“Was death the consequence of sin, as Scripture seems to say pretty plainly?”

With respect to Adam - yes.

“Or did God use cycles of death to bring about the variety of creatures we see today?”

Yes, but without the “Or” God may have had different plans for mankind than for animals.

“Also, was Adam created with the appearance of age?”

Who knows and why is it even relevant?


58 posted on 09/06/2017 7:46:52 AM PDT by ZULU (DITCH MITCH!!! DUMP RYAN!! DROP DEAD MCCAIN!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

I think you are arguing semantics and nobody knows by what mechanism God chose to create anything.


59 posted on 09/06/2017 7:48:07 AM PDT by ZULU (DITCH MITCH!!! DUMP RYAN!! DROP DEAD MCCAIN!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: LaRueLaDue

Wise choice. I resolve to do likewise.


60 posted on 09/06/2017 7:49:15 AM PDT by ZULU (DITCH MITCH!!! DUMP RYAN!! DROP DEAD MCCAIN!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson