There’s much more to learn.
Back in WW2 we had some movies called “Why We Fight” ... now, imagine for a moment these films, including within them what to them were statements of historical events, were shown (by some time traveller) to Congress in 1933? And said time traveller could prove himself such? Suppose he also showed them Triumph of the Will? What should the isolationists do under those circumstances?
Now let us look at something kinda similar: suppose someone (who was already waging unconventional warfare against us) published and sold, in their own bookstores and often in English, various texts and law books that amounted to their own “Why We Fight”. Books written by them for them. Would it be wise to see what they said to each other for why they opposed you?
It matters not one jot if they’ve got their own ideology “correct” because right or wrong this is what they say to each other for why THEY fight and that fact is objectively provable.
Listen and learn about why they say they fight: http://youtu.be/vKzkuQyexZc
... so you can refute the ninnies who are desperately in need of cranial extraction procedures.
>>Back in WW2 we had some movies called “Why We Fight” ... now, imagine for a moment these films, including within them what to them were statements of historical events, were shown (by some time traveller) to Congress in 1933? And said time traveller could prove himself such? Suppose he also showed them Triumph of the Will? What should the isolationists do under those circumstances?
http://freerepublic.com/tag/whywefight/index