Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump says tax hike on rich possible as he steps up talks with Democrats
Reuters ^ | September 13, 2017 | by Steve Holland, David Morgan

Posted on 09/13/2017 2:47:08 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the rich might see a hike in taxes as he pursues a major tax overhaul with outreach to Democrats who oppose cutting rates for the wealthy, while Republicans in Congress set a timetable to unveil their plan.

“I think the wealthy will be pretty much where they are,” Trump said of taxes on the rich, without specifying the income level. “If they have to go higher, they’ll go higher, frankly.”

“I think the wealthy will be pretty much where they are,” Trump said of taxes on the rich, without specifying the income level. “If they have to go higher, they’ll go higher, frankly.”

Trump will host Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday evening to discuss the legislative agenda with a focus on the tax overhaul after meetings with bipartisan groups of lawmakers on Tuesday night and Wednesday afternoon.

“We should be able to come together to make government work for the people,” Trump told reporters.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 115th; classwarfare; definerich; definewealthy; taxes; third100days; trumptaxcuts; trumptaxes; trumptaxreform; whoaretherich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 09/13/2017 2:47:08 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Wrong headed but maybe temporarily necessary to get the tax cuts he wants and we need.

How I hate the GOP and their disgusting “leaders”. THROW THE BUMS OUT!!!!


2 posted on 09/13/2017 2:49:23 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216
...temporarily necessary...

With the Democrats, there is no such thing as a Temporary tax hike. And the Dems will define "rich" as "having a full-time job."
3 posted on 09/13/2017 2:51:52 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Would be interesting to see how Trump defines ‘rich’.


4 posted on 09/13/2017 2:53:09 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The election euphoria is gone for me. With the exception of the SCOTUS selection, not much really has changed.


5 posted on 09/13/2017 2:53:10 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216
So much for across the board tax cuts.

I believe 50% already don't pay any federal taxes, but let's make it more progressive. That'll make the economy hum.

6 posted on 09/13/2017 2:55:42 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Tax cuts on the rich, would put a massively larger amount of money into the private sector.

That would effectively double the potential for economic growth.

“The rich”, IMO would include tens of thousands of small businesses. They are the bread and butter of job creation.

The Left loves to attack this group. Trump should avoid it at all cost. It will defeat the attainment of the full potential of his goals.


7 posted on 09/13/2017 2:59:12 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (7.5 mos M/R joining dems to block Cons. agenda? No problem. Trump deal w/Dems, big problem! Ah NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

And it isn’t going to until we stop sending a false opposition party to Washington.


8 posted on 09/13/2017 2:59:32 PM PDT by chris37 (Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Trying to sweeten up the Democrats never works.

Tax cuts for all. Or Tax cuts for none. I’m poor and I disagree with tax hikes for the rich. The more money and wealth that people have, the better it is for me.

Period.

Doesn’t the GOP have a majority?

Even considering making deals with them is a huge red flag.


9 posted on 09/13/2017 3:00:21 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I really really hate our tax code - it is unfair to those who pay, and it is not a good economic policy in terms of raising funds for the government.

I wish, but know it can never happen, that we repealed the 16th (and 17th) amendments and replaced it with a very simply consumption tax - not a VAT. My second choice would be a true flat tax - something like a standard deduction up to 20k or so, and 15% everything above that. No exemptions, no exceptions, no games and no loopholes for anything. What you do with your money after that is your business - give to charity, buy a house - up to you, but no tax adjustments for anything.

Of course, neither of these two options will ever happen.


10 posted on 09/13/2017 3:02:29 PM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Interesting take by Trump.

For me and our household, it will depend upon whom Trump, et al determine who is "rich.""

I know that the dim party determine pretty much any family working and earning a combined $100,000 to be "wealthy," no matter the size of their family, what part of the country they live in or how high their other taxes are.

Congress critters all get by without paying taxes, get to participate in insider trading (by family members, of course) yet pretend to belong to the "working class!"

A POX on all their houses!!!

11 posted on 09/13/2017 3:03:32 PM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

a lot less border crossings for one thing and an increase in deportations...

i am not in favor of a tax hike on the rich but would be willing to trade that for a large tax cut on businesses...


12 posted on 09/13/2017 3:04:54 PM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Careful. Could be fake news. Reuters.


13 posted on 09/13/2017 3:07:10 PM PDT by WKTimpco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The sooner the GOP is destroyed, the better.


14 posted on 09/13/2017 3:08:05 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

So much for the American dream of "getting rich" one day. Progressive taxation only makes keeping the next dollar you earn much more difficult than the previous one, regardless of the amount of blood, sweat, and tears poured into the effort. That is not "The American Way".


15 posted on 09/13/2017 3:10:18 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

“Wrong headed but maybe temporarily necessary to get the tax cuts he wants and we need.”

No, just wrong.


16 posted on 09/13/2017 3:13:33 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

He wouldn’t be in this position if the House and Senate GOP had its act together.


17 posted on 09/13/2017 3:14:31 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Give the “rich” (whoever they are) a higher rate that they can pay voluntarily. There’s been a lot of rich liberals saying they want to pay more in taxes. Give them a award if they pay the higher rate. Liberals love awards.


18 posted on 09/13/2017 3:16:04 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (CNN IS ISIS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zerosix

Current threshold being discussed is $250k.


19 posted on 09/13/2017 3:16:18 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

He has always stated that the “rich” such as himself might pay more taxes during the campaign. Nothing new here. The question is what is the definition rich?


20 posted on 09/13/2017 3:17:14 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson