To: rellimpank
They were likely sending the MSG. that your gun band is a stupid idea.
To: rellimpank
How much ignorance can you fit into one story?
“semiautomatic rifles that can load magazines with multiple bullets”
3 posted on
09/19/2017 6:58:31 AM PDT by
G Larry
(There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
To: rellimpank
I could not even read this whole thing. It is obvious from the beginning that the author is gun ignorant and gun stupid but has been fed the anti-gun political propaganda by the anti gun anti constitution folks on the left.
The author of this garbage needs to take the time to actually know what the hell they are talking about. He is speaking about guns the way a person who has never even touched one does. He/she is quite obviously gun stupid.
To: rellimpank
I was kinda lookin’ for a raffle where they were offering up the NON-dangerous type of AR. Guess I’ll keep lookin’. ;-)
6 posted on
09/19/2017 7:09:06 AM PDT by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: rellimpank
Nobody needs such a powerful weapon to protect themselvesDrink!
7 posted on
09/19/2017 7:10:41 AM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: rellimpank
Does anyone want a non-dangerous weapon?
I know I don’t.
8 posted on
09/19/2017 7:11:30 AM PDT by
chris37
(Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
To: rellimpank
...Nobody need such a powerful weapon to protect themselves their homes or to hunt...
However, there have been several instances where a single person with one of these dreaded and evil firearms successfully fought off multiple armed home invaders by killing, wounding them, or running them off..
9 posted on
09/19/2017 7:13:20 AM PDT by
Sasparilla
( I'm Not Tired of Winning.)
To: rellimpank
10 posted on
09/19/2017 7:17:24 AM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: rellimpank
Nobody need such a powerful weapon to protect themselves their homes or to hunt. Actually, there's growing support that the AR-15 is ideal for home defense. It's light, easy to use, and research demonstrates the .223 round presents less of an overpenetration risk than more conventional handgun and shotgun options.
11 posted on
09/19/2017 7:17:44 AM PDT by
Drew68
To: rellimpank
Nobody need such a powerful weapon to protect themselves their homes or to hunt.It's a Bill of RIGHTS, not a Bill of NEEDS.
16 posted on
09/19/2017 7:26:10 AM PDT by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: rellimpank
The author of this editorial is a fool. A very foolish fool. Wisdom is lacking in this one.
17 posted on
09/19/2017 7:47:56 AM PDT by
Tudorfly
(All things are possible within the will of God.)
To: rellimpank
"The village bans the gun for good reason. Nobody need such a powerful weapon to protect themselves their homes or to hunt."
Uhhhh, this type of ignorance is hard take. Other than a .22 rifle used to shoot squirrels, an AR-15 is LESS powerful than just about any hunting rifle on the market.
To: rellimpank
semiautomatic rifles that can load magazines with multiple bulletsAnd here I've been loading my own magazines. I need that AR that will load its own magazines.
19 posted on
09/19/2017 8:19:31 AM PDT by
IYAS9YAS
(There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
To: rellimpank
Have you noticed that the Left always includes the phrase “Nobody needs...”? The Constitution isn’t about NEEDS. It’s about RIGHTS. I could just as easily make a case that nobody NEEDS a cell phone, or the NY Times. Sheesh!
21 posted on
09/19/2017 8:51:57 AM PDT by
Pecos
(A Constitutional republic shouldnÂ’t need to hold its collective breath in fear of lawyers.)
To: rellimpank; G Larry; oldenuff35; Puppage; Tudorfly; IYAS9YAS; circlecity; Pecos; All
AUTHOR PROFILE:
- Stuck on stupid (beyond question)
- Liberal (definitely)
- Urban (.95 probability -- based on remarks)
- Female [or Quee]r (one certainly hopes it doesn't claim masculinity)
- U.S. Public Schooled (grade "Editorial" for proof)
- Millenial, or younger (older lin beral would not s
- SJW (Why else would one make such a public fool of oneself?)
- Never touched a firearm (based on remarks)
- Worthless as a writer ("Editorial" offered as evidence)
- Sub-median IQ (organization & content of "Editorial")
- "Inclusive" (quotes both black & white imbeciles)
- Never read or understood the Constitution (self-evident)
- Anonymous (ashamed of own work -- or never learned its own name)
- Needs range time [,22 - .50 + 12 Ga] (possibly redeemable)
...otherwise...
- Worthless CO2 emitter (inferior to burning old tires...)
Thread participants are invited to expand the above list...
22 posted on
09/19/2017 9:13:51 AM PDT by
TXnMA
(Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
To: rellimpank
Nobody need such a powerful weapon to protect themselves their homes or to hunt. Says who?
23 posted on
09/19/2017 10:59:47 AM PDT by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson