Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I am 100% for this and increasing punishment/penalties for harming innocent animals on purpose.

I doubt they would increase it to what I think it should be but every step in that direction helps. Maybe one day we will figure out people who do this have no business living. Period.

1 posted on 09/22/2017 11:26:08 AM PDT by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Boomer

How about baby murderers? Do they have to register? Nah. We’ll protect unborn dolphins but slaughter our unborn children.


2 posted on 09/22/2017 11:28:18 AM PDT by LouAvul (The most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Thanks so much for your support to this point... I personally apprecaite it...
FReepers, it's far beyond time to wrap up this FReep-a-thon.  Lets do it today.  Please chip in.


President Donald J. Trump and the Free Republic of the United States of America
President Donald J. Trump's address to the United Nations on 09/19/2017.

Ramirez political cartoon:  Sanctuary State LARGE VERSION 09/21/2017: LINK  LINK to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).
Garrison political cartoon:  Good Boy LARGE VERSION 09/22/2017: LINK  LINK (scroll down) to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).


Please join the monthlies, an automated and the best way to help support Free Republic.  If you opt not to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project.  LINK



FReepers, 98.62% of the Third Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met.  Click above and pencil in your donation now.  Please folks, lets end this FReepathon.  Thank you!

...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...

Just $339.00 dollars to 99.00%

3 posted on 09/22/2017 11:29:26 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (DACA: Their dream, our nightmare... will the rule of law prevail or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Good!

Anyone that intentionally harms little kids, the mentally disabled or animals, and those teachers who seduce their students deserve the WORST to happen to them!

Sickos!


4 posted on 09/22/2017 11:30:05 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

A person that abuses animals can be expected to abuse humans.

They don’t have the empathy gene.


6 posted on 09/22/2017 11:30:47 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (DACA: Their dream, our nightmare... will the rule of law prevail or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

No, because the bar would be constantly being raised. Today, dogs and cats, in ten years chickens, pigs, cows.


7 posted on 09/22/2017 11:33:17 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Constantly doing things in opposition to human nature is insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Fast-forward to the near future when speaking against pedophilia will be considered hate speech.


8 posted on 09/22/2017 11:33:17 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (https://imgoat.com/uploads/645920e395/39513.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Abattoir workers most affected.


11 posted on 09/22/2017 11:39:12 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer
"I am 100% for this and increasing punishment/penalties for harming innocent animals on purpose."

Who gets to define this? Perhaps PETA will say that killing cows, chickens, pigs, etc for food is "harming innocent animals on purpose." Applying "hate-type" penalties to harming animals intentionally slides us down a slope that a more progressive administration could use for their own benefit.

I don't like the idea of anyone intentionally harming my pets or others' pets or even abusing animals meant for slaughter, but I don't want to open the door that seems like a good idea now that might be used later to close down our rights.

Here's a seemingly outlandish example: PETA and others think that we aren't pet owners but are instead pet adopters. If we agreed with that and put a collar on our pets, is that abuse? You might not agree but the Powers-That-Be may just use it to charge you with intentional harm of an animal.

I don't know the future but I don't want to give the next progressive administration; federal, state, or local, an opening to make us feel like we have slipped into 1984.

12 posted on 09/22/2017 11:43:13 AM PDT by Purdue77 (I can't afford a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

I understand people want to protect animals, and that abusing animals is a sign of something deeper being wrong with you... but I can only see this as more government, bigger government, more overreach, more authoritarian, etc.


14 posted on 09/22/2017 11:44:03 AM PDT by caligatrux (Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

How long before animal activeists use this to go after the meat industry?


16 posted on 09/22/2017 11:51:49 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

How long before animal activeists use this to go after the meat industry?


17 posted on 09/22/2017 11:51:49 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

How long before animal activeists use this to go after the meat industry?


18 posted on 09/22/2017 11:51:51 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

I back this 100%. Anyone who willfully abuses animals should damned well have a social stigma attached to them.


19 posted on 09/22/2017 11:54:48 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberals, go find another country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

Good.

Anyone who can’t make a clear distinction between animals used for food (who *STILL* should not be subject to any more pain or stress than necessary) and others (be it a PETA member or someone whining about a slippery slope) is an idiot.

Personally, anyone inflicting pain on a dog or cat or parrot should be shot on the spot.


20 posted on 09/22/2017 11:57:40 AM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, deport all illegal aliens, abolish the IRS, DEA and ATF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

I don’t think it should be a law, because what happens if a PETA member decided to kill a person on the register. I heard that a sex offender got killed because of the sex offender list. He was 17 and the victim was 14...


24 posted on 09/22/2017 12:19:12 PM PDT by ConservaTeen (Islam is Not the Religion of Peace, but The religion of Pedophilia...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer
Before we start “registering” animal abusers why don't we focus on human victims...murderers,abusers of children and the elderly among others?
28 posted on 09/22/2017 12:36:04 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (ObamaCare Works For Those Who Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer
Animal Abusers Could Be Made to Register Like Sex Offenders

A feel-good tar baby that would quickly expand to pauperize and "control" property owners who attempt to rid their homes of vermin.

30 posted on 09/22/2017 12:42:33 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (America returns to the Rule of Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

This is dumb. What’s abuse? If you don’t take your pet to the vet, is that abuse? How about shooting chipmunks or squirrels in your yard? If a dog is left outside all the time but is fed is that abuse? How about having a de-clawed cat because it stays in doors but destroys your furniture?

For every case of some deranged asshole setting an animal on fire to torture it there’s hundreds of what I listed above. It will all come down to who decides...


32 posted on 09/22/2017 12:58:27 PM PDT by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer

The lists will increase until everyone is some type of offender. Be careful what you ask for.


40 posted on 09/22/2017 1:35:40 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Boomer
Having first-hand experience with some pet Nazis from a rescue shelter, I would be strongly opposed to this proposal without some serious safeguards. Our interaction with these lunatics was so bizarre that it seemed like a Monty Python skit. Fortunately, their vet told them that there was nothing wrong with the dog except she was very old.

Despite a complete lack of evidence, these fanatics were still self-righteously convinced that we were abusing the dog and had this list been available, I'm certain they would have tried to get us listed on this registry.

It is exactly these type of people who will ultimately get control of that registry.

51 posted on 09/22/2017 4:14:39 PM PDT by CommerceComet (Hillary: A unique blend of arrogance, incompetence, and corruption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson