The Obama administration used unmasking like some of us use Google. Nothing wrong with that, is there? They're government officials, and progressives. They can't have google saving their searches. Besides, laws don't apply to them.
1 posted on
09/25/2017 5:30:07 PM PDT by
SJackson
To: SJackson
The entirety of the federal government has been corrupted by the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
Everyone in the District of Corruption is complicit in the violation of the Constitution so there is no one to investigate much less prosecute any of the other crimes.
2 posted on
09/25/2017 5:39:06 PM PDT by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
To: SJackson
If Samantha Powers did unmask, and everyone knows she did it, then it must not be illegal.
She should either be prosecuted, or conservatives should shut up.
To: SJackson
Unmask the Monkey?
That'd be a whole lot easier if the 1st Amendment was restored in the context of collectivist artificial persons called "corporations".
TRUTH IS GREAT AND WILL PREVAIL Unless _______________?
Any corporation found to be silencing employees to maintain profetable dishonesty.... should lose their corporate charter.
Lying should not be synonymous with doing Bidness As Usual.
It is incumbent upon the honorable craftsman to be aware
of whether or not his services are being used
as a means to accomplish evil ends -
and to act (or NOT) accordingly.
4 posted on
09/25/2017 5:50:43 PM PDT by
HLPhat
("TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS" -- Government with any other purpose is not American.)
To: SJackson; Whenifhow; LS; GregNH; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; ...
5 posted on
09/25/2017 6:12:19 PM PDT by
bitt
(The press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literal)
To: SJackson
What do folks expect?
The purpose and end of Power IS Power.
6 posted on
09/25/2017 6:13:50 PM PDT by
Little Ray
(Freedom Before Security!)
To: SJackson
It is some sort of a natural law- Available technology will be used by the government. If there is an ability to spy on people, people will be spied on.Banning the practice by means of passing laws or judicial proscriptions can only make the practice hard to use directly to convict someone in a court of law with spy evidence. If damaging information cannot be used in court then it will be “leaked.”
7 posted on
09/25/2017 6:28:41 PM PDT by
arthurus
To: SJackson
8 posted on
09/25/2017 6:30:22 PM PDT by
Rumplemeyer
(The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson