Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With the D3000, China enters the robotic warship arms race
Popular Science ^ | September 25, 2017 | Jeffrey Lin and P.W. Singer

Posted on 09/25/2017 7:26:13 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

D3000

This crudely made model of the D3000 gives us a vague idea of the concept: a trimaran tumblehome hull, with armament that includes autocannons and anti-ship missiles, as well as launching tubes for small unmanned underwater vehicles, torpedoes, or mines.

by78

At the turn of the 20th century, the great powers competed to build the modern-day battleship. Today, a new arms race may be breaking out, this time with robotic warships.

The D3000 is a 98-foot-long, stealthy robotic trimaran warship designed to operate autonomously for months. Notably, this system—which appears to be tagged for export—is being offered by the China Aerospace and Science Technology Corporation, a Chinese defense contractor whose primary strength is in missiles and other aerospace technologies. (It's the company that's building the T Flight, China's answer to the Hyperloop.) CASC notes that the D3000 can either operate by itself, or as part of a larger task force with manned ships.

This isn't the first time China has offered a trimaran warship for export; the China Shipbuilding Trading Company offered a 2,400-ton trimaran frigate (manned) at the IDEX 2017 arms fair in the UAE earlier this year.

NEEDS BETTER PROPS DEPARTMENT

While the D3000 seems to be a serious enough export proposal for high intensity naval warfare, CASC clearly didn't put much effort into the display model; the weight of four Type 730 Gatling cannons would make the ship top heavy, and the anti-ship missile canisters don't even fit into the hull!

by78

From available pictures, the D3000 has significant stealth shaping and likely displaces about 100-150 tons. While the model shows that the D3000 is armed with three Type 730 Gatling cannons (two stern, one aft), the conceptual nature of the robot warship suggests that we shouldn't take that armament fit seriously. More realistically, the D3000 will also be armed with anti-ship missile launchers built into its superstructure, and launch tubes above the waterline. Those launch tubes could potentially be used to launch torpedoes, lay mines, or deploy underwater unmanned vehicles.

Using unmanned vessels as a mothership for more unmanned systems is becoming popular in both defense and civilian applications. In this case, unmanned surface vehicles could extend the sensor net of the D3000, hiding underwater to spot enemy submarines and carriers to call back to the D3000, which, in turn, networks firing solutions to friendly ships and aircraft.

China has already tested (and tried to sell) other armed unmanned surface vehicles. The High Speed Intercept Boat is a 42-foot trimaran with speeds of 80 knots and can be armed with machine guns and anti-tank guided missiles, potentially operating in unmanned swarms. It is being tested by the PLAN, and made its international debut in 2016 in Malaysia.

ACTUV SEA HUNTER

DARPA's Sea Hunter, a 100-foot unmanned surface vehicle designed to hunt submarines, is currently the world's largest warship of its kind.

Wikipedia

The D3000's closest international counterpart is the Sea Hunter, built for DARPA's ACTUV anti-submarine program. The 131-foot, 145 ton Sea Hunter has a speed of only 27 knots, but that's fine because it's conceived as a test ship for future unmanned operations. Conceptually, the Sea Hunter and its follow-ons would also take on roles like tracking enemy submarines and mine detection, as opposed to antiship role reflected the D3000 concept. Of course, there's nothing from stopping China from building its own sub-hunting robotic warships to make up for its historical anti-submarine warfare weakness.

That China is already pitching a large robotic warship for export—and from a vendor not typically known for such offerings—suggests a high degree of confidence in the global competitiveness of the country's unmanned naval technologies. In turn, more established shipbuilders like the China State Shipbuilding Corporation and the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) are certainly not going to sit the robotic revolution out, so expect more news on robotic Chinese warships in the near future.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; china; redchina; robotic; third100days; trumpasia; usv; warship

1 posted on 09/25/2017 7:26:14 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They could have made a better model out of legos.


2 posted on 09/25/2017 7:28:07 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Yeah, but they're still inscrutable, right...?

;^)

3 posted on 09/25/2017 8:18:24 PM PDT by Gargantua (The wheel is spinnin' and it can't slow down... ;^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
She looks like she borrows from the USS Zumwalt, USS Independence, and G.I. Joe. All that's missing is a action figure.
4 posted on 09/25/2017 8:19:11 PM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Being contemptuous of the model is probably not a good idea. Lets see what the actual ship does.

A monohull tumblehome configuration is good for stealth, but has horrible seaworthiness issues.

The trimaran configuration is one way to solve that problem.

The most sure-fire way to lose a battle is to underestimate our adversary...

5 posted on 09/25/2017 10:24:23 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

“The trimaran configuration is one way to solve that problem.”

It’s actually genius, with a drone boat. wow.

Better not under estimate this concept.


6 posted on 09/25/2017 10:29:10 PM PDT by CJ Wolf (It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

All your robot ships are belong to us!


7 posted on 09/25/2017 11:14:40 PM PDT by Herakles (Diversity is a globalist scam for power!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; CurlyDave; CJ Wolf
My snarkiness was directed at the model being comically overloaded and looking like a copycat of US designs.

Another chinese company has come up with a larger and more realistic looking concept: Meet China's triple-hulled warship of the future. This uses the trimaran hull to get a large hangar and flight deck aft. The Chinese navy has a experimental trimaran, as a patrol and search and rescue vessel: The mystery of PLAN's new trimaran boat is now solved. The PLAN is definitely interested in the concept. Ships that have higher speeds, larger deck area, and more limited payloads have real world utility.

China may be taking a more realistic approach to trimaran designs. They have built a small patrol ship first, and can work their way up as experience is gained. The USN LCS program looks like it expecting far too much from too small a ship.

Remote controlled ships cost a lot more than drones, and no remote control system is going to be completely secure on the battlefield. This makes using remote controlled ships a much greater risk. If a remote or autonomous ASW ship broke down or had a computer failure while enemy submarines are around it could be disastrous. Losing a aerial drone is less of a problem. If a ship can be remotely controlled, then it can be automated enough a small crew could be used as a safeguard, but that isn't working for the LCS.

8 posted on 09/26/2017 7:55:33 AM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson