Posted on 09/25/2017 10:03:30 PM PDT by nickcarraway
How odd. I’m a white, married woman and my hubby does NOT tell me who to vote for — much less anything else. That’s just her making one more lousy excuse.
I don’t like her because she’s a pathological liar and she has no conscience. A classic narcissist. That’s also why I would never have voted for her.
That and I’m conservative.
Never heard of this writer.
What a dolt
Hillary Clinton and the liberals who think like her are too stupid to realize they condemn themselves when they try to speak for, or read the minds of, millions of women in this way. It is ridiculous and insulting to assume we are quivering weak willed masses who stand alone at the voting booth thinking “Oh no I better choose the candidate my husband/brother/friend told me to cause if she wins they will know us women didn’t obey them!” Ah haha. Given a choice many of us really do prefer to have a man with vision in charge over a shrewish, divisive, entitled female. Imagine that.
So it turns out that white, heterosexual and married women surprised and disappointed Hitlery by voting with their brains instead of their sex organs.
Her whining and sniveling just confirms that Hillary expected to win through identity politics rather than appealing to voters on the basis of policy or agenda.
Critics say she lost because she didn’t have a message but that isn’t entirely correct.
She had several messages:
“Vote for me because you are a female.”
“Vote for me because you are black.”
“Vote for me because you are a sexual oddity.”
“Vote for me because you are a whining snowflake.”
“Vote for me because you want the government to give you more free stuff.”
HRC is one person that continues to amaze me by what a bad person she continues to be.
I vote for what’s between the ears, not for what’s between the legs.
Option 1: Married women did not vote for Hillary because the men in their lives pressured women who happen to be married not to vote for Hillary.
Option 2: Married women did not vote for Hillary because men are far less likely to marry the sort of shrewish, bitter, angry, entitled , and vicious woman who would vote for a candidate like Hillary.
My money is on Option 2 as the overwhelming reason Hillary did poorly with married women. A woman who votes based on identity politics is not a woman I would marry, no matter how attractive she might look from a distance and before I know her.
Statistically, married couples are better off than single people whether the wife works or not. They see the economic impacts of higher taxes and Obamacare. Why would a woman vote against her family’s economic interests?
Ironic - she tried to manipulate White women by claiming they were capable of/prone to being manipulated.....
Agreed.. Hillary doesn’t stand for anything that is important to me. She wants American kids to sit in the back of the lines for education, healthcare and more. Lawbreakers like the dreamer who shot church attendees in Nashville Sunday get first dibs.
She ruined healthcare, as we knew it, as a First Lady with her initial subsidies for insurance companies.
She wants choice for women, which means molesters and abusers get off Scott free. She has a historical sweet spot for them.
She raised a self indulgent brat.. but did she ever really change a dirty diaper?
When was the last time she had to.. get the kids ready, hand her husband his coffee and go to her eight plus hour shift, and only pump a few dollars of gas because payday isn’t here.
Tax and spend. No.
Heterosexual? Really? Other than that one time with Webb Hubbell, is there any actual evidence of that?
“I wonder how long it will take her to finally understand and admit this?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVk44b2501E
From the article “A college-educated woman identifying as a liberal Democrat confided to Kretschmer – not wanting to be identified, as a Trump voter – that she had voted for him over Clinton because her husband’s job depends on the coal industry; she saw Trump as the candidate that would protect it, and by extension her family’s economic interests. Kretschmer called her story “the clearest, most heartbreaking validation of our article that I had ever heard”.”
Social “Science” is largely hokum and this study is no exception. Liberals constantly complain about people not voting in their own interest, yet here is a perfect example of a woman voting in her and her family’s interest and they find it “heartbreaking”. Hitlery was NOT right and women did not vote for Trump because their husbands forced them to.
Where? In Starbucks drinking lattes of course.
OK, that’s funny.
I wonder what a profiler would think of her book? A pyscho-analyst? A propagandist? An INTEL analyst?
I have watched behavioral expert analysis on HRC’s body language and found that interesting (although I am only mildly accepting of that science).
Remember how excited the media was to have a woman one heartbeat away from the White House when Sarah Palin was the VP candidate?
I don’t either...
They don’t want a normal pro-life woman who hunts to represent us.
They were busy slinging all sorts of truly vile and disgusting remarks at her.
HOGWASH. I have a HS education, hubby is a Ret. SCPO 20 yrs Navy, 20 yrs Jr. College Prof. I do all the political research. Guess who tells who they should vote for, that includes the 1 son who will vote, even my sister’s family votes how I tell them, because they know I did my homework, ME!
Ummm...Hillary is not heterosexual.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.