Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What say you?
1 posted on 09/28/2017 9:11:34 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RinaseaofDs

After eight years of Trump, this too shall fall.

+++++

The Court is their stronghold.


2 posted on 09/28/2017 9:16:09 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

IMHO, there’s a notion that the Judicial system is the most “sacred” of the Three Powers it’s members are “pure” and beyond reproach from being evil.

I once had a tagline that read, Tyranny hides within decorum. We can’t attack decorum. Same with the Judicial system.


3 posted on 09/28/2017 9:17:31 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Orthodox American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

Excoriating and exposing individual judges is all fine and dandy.

But Congress needs to reform the judiciary in it’s entirety.

We only need about 5 district courts and 1/5 the number of federal judges we have now. As for the screams about the workload and backlog of federal cases under that scenario, Congress can stridently limit the scope of judicial oversight to ONLY those cases which pertain to demonstrable Constitutional questions.

the states can handle everything else.


4 posted on 09/28/2017 9:27:26 AM PDT by Mariner (Pink Pussy Hats for the NFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

Bureau of Land Management (BLM). They are the wild ones out West. Judge Gloria Navarro — a true whore for Harry Reid. Sessions should be ashamed.


5 posted on 09/28/2017 9:42:11 AM PDT by happytrumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

What I don’t understand is the lefties/libs/RATS shop for their judges but Trump/conservatives don’t. Why not? Goose and gander.


7 posted on 09/28/2017 10:05:13 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

Absolutely *horrible* idea to out jurors. Jurists’ identities are protected to keep their decisions from being swayed by fear. Imagine if all the white jurors who found a cop who shot an unarmed black man were publicly IDed so they could be threatened, harassed & possibly harmed by BLM scumbags. Could any future cop get a fair trial if jurors were worried about themselves & their families being placed in danger if they vote ‘not guilty’? Does that sound like a great idea to you? This is why jurors remain anonymous unless they themselves choose to come forward & speak with the media.


8 posted on 09/28/2017 10:14:15 AM PDT by Vigilant1 (The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RinaseaofDs

Even though I’m cancelling my National Review subscription in disgust after 36 years with them...this Judicial Activism blog on NRO is worth reading:
http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos


10 posted on 09/28/2017 10:45:07 AM PDT by Bonneville (Truth...the new hate speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson