Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is a BIG DEAL if Trump does this. It guts one of the major restrictions of obamacare and fixes the lack of insurance carriers that most have, some now having zero available carriers. And, basically, there are no drawbacks.

And NATURALLY, the Dems/leftists will sue to stop this, which means, once again, that the Dems/leftists will be on the wrong side of helping working American survive, by trying to actively thwart Americans from buying better and less expensive healthcare insurance for no other reason than the ideology that Americans should never be allowed a free choice for anything and that the government should have a total monopoly on healthcare.

1 posted on 09/28/2017 9:37:25 AM PDT by catnipman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: catnipman

Trump readies executive order that will let consumers cross state lines to buy health insurance
American Thinker ^ | 09/28/2017 | Rick Moran
Posted on 9/28/2017, 9:39:21 AM by SeekAndFind

Donald Trump is preparing an executive order that would achieve a long standing goal of insurance reform advocates.

The president’s executive order will reportedly allow individuals to join group plans from out of state. Current law allows companies to sell across state linesn but due to red tape and resistance by state insurance officials, most companies refuse to take advantage of the opportunity. The order would allow consumers to join associations and group health plans located in other states.

ABC News:

Current law allows companies to sell health insurance across state lines, but so far few have offered out-of-state policies. To date, although all states have the authority to do so, only six have enacted across state lines legislation.

And even among states that passed laws to allow out-of-state sales, no insurer has entered the market. Skeptics point out the difficulties that companies face in developing a health insurance product that can be sold in multiple states. They include challenges in building a provider network with competitive rates, regulatory and administrative differences across states and the impact on risk pools that could result in higher premiums for less-healthy individuals.

Proponents of the plan insist it can be done.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky, touted the idea Wednesday morning on MSNBC’s Morning Joe.

“I believe President Trump can legalize, on his own, the ability of individuals to join a group or health association across state lines to buy insurance,” said Paul.

While the White House has not offered further guidance on the executive order Trump mentioned, Paul said he’s discussed his proposal with the president.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3590048/posts


2 posted on 09/28/2017 9:42:52 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Free people stand proudly! Slaves cower and kneel before their masters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

“Dems/leftists will sue to stop this”

They’ll go further than suing. It’ll be one more reason for impeachment for them.


3 posted on 09/28/2017 9:44:18 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia (#DrainTheSwamp #HeFights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

Rand Paul, IMHO, is the only principled Senator out the 100. He’s still pushing for full repeal.

He said immediately that he would not vote for the Lindsey Graham proposal, because while it made some changes, it simply formalized the corrupt subsidies to Obamacare crony insurance companies.


4 posted on 09/28/2017 9:45:48 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

At least Rand Paul is trying to do something about healthcare. McCain, Collins and others vote against it and say bipartisan work needs to be done, but don’t do anything.


5 posted on 09/28/2017 9:47:12 AM PDT by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

This would be a devastating, Executive-level uppercut to the glass jaw of McConnell and his snarky cabal of malcontents, and I, for one, would absolutely LOVE to see Trump do it so I could enjoy the firework BANG-BANG-POW of elitist heads exploding all across the country.

How ya like me now!?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVzvRsl4rEM


6 posted on 09/28/2017 9:48:34 AM PDT by HKMk23 (You ask how to fight an idea? Well, I'll tell you how: with another idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

Health Care Service Corporation (HCSC) seems to have partially solved the across state line problem without congress sor:
Illinois; Texas; New Mexico; Oklahoma and Montana.
http://www.hcsc.com/who-we-are/history


9 posted on 09/28/2017 9:54:25 AM PDT by stylin19a (Lynch & Clinton - Snakes on a Plane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

http://www.thelibertyconservative.com/trump-to-back-rand-paul-health-care-proposal/


10 posted on 09/28/2017 9:55:04 AM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

What a coward. Allow me to translate:

“Congress, bereft of any sense of duty, loyalty to the represented, or honor in any measurable quantity, chose to do nothing on what we promised we’d do for over seven years.

Instead, we are going to leave it to the man we’ve actively opposed and sabotaged at every turn to make good on the promises we made to you.

Vote GOP!”


12 posted on 09/28/2017 9:57:37 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Truth, in a time of universal deceit, is courage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman
Yeah, Trump is an absolute genius at anticipating and having a path forward that both solves the problem from a practical standpoint, in this case addressing the fact that his refusal to keep illegally funding ObamaCare will price some insurers out of the markets, while preventing his enemies from playing the blame game and often going on the offensive and turning the blame game against them.

The Trump team are scary smart and competent

14 posted on 09/28/2017 10:04:29 AM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

The power over healthcare is not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, therefore, the power over healthcare is reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Amendment 10


18 posted on 09/28/2017 10:31:25 AM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

.
This is an excellent approach.

It will greatly diminish the danger of “single payer” gaining any traction.

Mostly what we need is repeal of all O-care taxes and limitations.
.


22 posted on 09/28/2017 10:51:12 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman
This is a BIG DEAL if Trump does this. It guts one of the major restrictions of obamacare and fixes the lack of insurance carriers that most have, some now having zero available carriers. And, basically, there are no drawbacks.

On the other hand, maybe there is a reason a given state or county has no insurance company willing to write policies for Obamacareites - ITS NOT PROFITABLE. So now that an insurance carrier can come from out of state to write policies, which insurance company is going to come and do so when IT IS NOT PROFITABLE!

The requirements of the ACA make it unaffordable for real insurance, or very expensive with deductibles too high for the people with the policies.

Question: Why would doctors take subsidized Obamacare patients (meaning they can't afford the premiums, so the government chips in) when they know the subsidized Obamacare patient can't afford to pay the deductible? They won't, because they know they won't get paid.

32 posted on 09/28/2017 12:55:15 PM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

Since the Constitution does not give the fed govt. control over health care, O-care is unconstitutional, but then there are lots of other unconstitutional laws and rulings. In spite of that, I think it’s very likely Dems would challenge either an EO or law passed by congress that would allow a healthcare policy described in this article (for example buying policies across state lines).


38 posted on 09/28/2017 2:40:35 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

Good plan, and good that DT and RP are working together.


42 posted on 09/28/2017 6:59:47 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson