So, the question should be asked - if ISIS has not traditionally claimed atrocities unless they were involved - why would they do this now? It reduce their credibility significantly and makes the response by their "official" media outlet, much less believable.
If you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, you would be able to comprehend I wasn't "reflexively taking the side of ISIS here?"
Suck it.
Yeah, ISIS would never lie...
You must not pay much attention to news reports of terrorist attacks. ISIS lays claim to terrorist attacks so often, it's nearly become a running joke.
In the last hour, the FBI has cast strong doubt on ISIS' claim of responsibility for the killings in Vegas.
Kindly GFY.
I see you're still offended that I dared to challenge ISIS. I still think that's pretty odd behavior for a Freeper.