Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity

Trump said the exact right thing to avoid the question and stop that whole line of questioning for the time. I don’t see him dong anything in this regard. At most he might support banning bump fire stocks if both houses of congress get behind it.

>><<

I think you are exactly right. He’s not going to abandon us on this.


31 posted on 10/03/2017 8:15:42 AM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: laplata

Bumpfire or slidefire buttstocks were long ago vetted by Obama’s BATFE. They do not alter semiautomatic rifle cycling in any way. One trigger pull equals one shot fired, with or without a bumpfire stock, which merely utilizes weapon recoil for rapid trigger action.

The law is clear on what constitutes a fully automatic weapon. Ban bumpfire stocks and you’re suddenly in Diane Feinstein territory banning: pistol grips, detachable magazines, everything covered in the 1994 AWB.

Which would mean a lot of House & Senate Republicans losing their jobs.


55 posted on 10/03/2017 8:37:46 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson