Well DUH..sent her 100 grand, for what “Hey enjoy the money cause Im gonna go out in a blaze of glory.” Also didn’t he supposedly tape himself shooting people inside his hotel room..for what purpose is he taping it..for himself? He knew he was a goner, he had no facebook account or twitter so who was he planning on sending the video to?
A $100 grand would set her up for a decent life in the islands after he was dead. She was getting out and he promised her a good life.
I heard he had a FB account. but it got yanked, pronto.
ISIS?
What a propaganda piece that would make huh
Or who was he FACETIMING or SKYPING it?
Of course I have no idea if this happened but maybe.
Another maybe is that he left the video to allow the police and people to see what he did his record.
Twisted mister.
I believe you are onto some large shin breaking bread crumbs.
While more details, and hopefully more accurate details, are likely to come, lets paint the picture a bit more based on what we already know.
**It is being widely reported, Paddock taped himself shooting people. At the end of the day, it is possible to relate this to narcissism.**
In addition to this, it has been reported Paddock had 2 former marriages, prior to his most recent girlfriend. Narcissism most certainly can be, and is a root cause for many divorces, as narcissism directly impacts a spouses ability to trust they are loved or even safe, as many narcissist types are also emotionally and physically unpredictable and abusive. You cannot trust a person who is in love with and only cares for themselves.
As well, it has been widely reported Paddock was not religious. While not always the case, a narcissist will quite naturally and likely be at war with religion. While not universal, this alone means Paddock is at odds with many or most patriotic freedom loving Americans! As well, Paddocks position on religion means he had his own self-serving and evolving or changing moral boundaries.
I believe this is evidence he had belief in, and a high or superior opinion of himself. Narcissism is equal to a persons superior opinion of themselves and idea’s above others, as well as a desire to control or subject others. Many left-wing individuals and politicians today actually are narcissist. True narcissist!
Look at those politicians today who deceive, and who persistently demand, that all Americans give up our individual freedoms and authority in exchange for their control over us through our subjection to their out-of-control, centrally controlled government! Ultimately, socialism must control all information, finance, resources, land, economy, quality of life, and human will itself! Socialism is the true and ultimate political manifestation and elevation of narcissistic politicians! When given opportunity, narcissism will subject all! No wonder the 1st Amendment has to do with the free flow of information.
Paddock has been called a serial gambler. Before going further, it is possible he was throwing around money to elevate himself in the eyes of those around him, rather than being a slave to the habit.
However, it should be stated, individuals with real gambling problems are not inherently or necessarily narcissistic.
In this case however, all things considered, whether it is a lack of self control, or if it is to impress others with himself, this can be and likely is evidence of a man blinded by his own self focus and or evidence of impulsive decision making. On at least a personal level, perpetually impulsive personal finance can be economically liberal as well.
Going further however, *1*someone who has an aversion to religion, *2*is accused as being a narcissist by previous wives, *3*who has gone through 2 divorces and living with another woman, and *4*who is emotionally and possibly physically unstable, *5*who is known to either have an impulsive gambling problem or be a serial gambler, and *6*taped himself indiscriminantly shooting and killing a predominantly patriotic crowd of freedom loving Americans, simply IS NOT A SOCIAL CONSERVATIVE!
Knowing I am likely to be attacked for stating the obvious, based on the information we already have, in my opinion, Paddock has proven himself to be liberal.
However, after highlighting what has already been pointed out, to get to the bottom of this horrific incident, one has to ask more far reaching questions. Who benefits the most from such an evil incident? Who is hurt most from this incident? Has this incident required our diverted attention from another crucial subject, incident, or activity?