Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise

17 posted on 10/03/2017 8:33:52 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: TigerClaws

That’s really, really, very, very, yugely f***ed up, man, bigly!

I have no idea if that is true or not, but I’m gonna be honest and say it makes me go hmmm. HMMMMMM!

I’ll also say I am getting really sick and tired of media people saying we just have no idea why, we can’t figure it out, no one knows why...

Someone knows why.

And they don’t want anyone else to know why.


24 posted on 10/03/2017 8:40:29 PM PDT by chris37 (Tagline is currently under repair!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
This story would at least well explain why he dragged so many gunz to the Suite.

The current gubmint story has no explanation for that generally acknowledged fact. Of course there could be many other stories in a similar vein.

34 posted on 10/03/2017 8:50:55 PM PDT by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

the guns were ‘show and tell’ ? seems to be a variety. But why are the bumps the $99 variety? I’m really disappointed in this millionaire - cheap rooms, cheap parts, cheap ride.

I hope the LVPD has checked monthly storage places for spaces rented under his, her variants or the Ericksen name.


45 posted on 10/03/2017 9:00:56 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

This is about the most plausible explanation I’ve seen so far. Perhaps the rich gambler MO was a cover for arms dealer. That was definitely his background.

If a terrorist picked the date and location for an arms deal with the plans to turn it into a terror attack, this could make sense.

But the question would then be where are the terrorists and the additional weapons?

There should be surveillance video that could support or disprove this theory.

But too many things don’t add up for what has been reported so far to be a straight story.


99 posted on 10/04/2017 12:37:35 AM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

interesting links, thanks.

the thing that has puzzled me most from the start is, why take 23 or however many guns (plus ammo) up into that room? if this was planned (and it looks like it was) taking up this quantity would only increase the risk of being detected before the attack?

maybe he was part of an FBI sting or op (entered into knowingly or otherwise) and the psycho decided to out himself in this way to get back at them?


102 posted on 10/04/2017 2:36:20 AM PDT by Mr Radical (In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Is it at all possible that (a) to Paddock it was an arms deal he was going to make, (b) but his buyers turned out to be terrorists that held him hostage while they conducted their rampage, (c) killing him as soon as they quit firing and made their way out of the room before the police arrived.

In which their would be video footage on the hotels security system that showed the departure of the terrorists from Paddocks room.

Just the conspiracy theory part of my mind at work.


124 posted on 10/04/2017 7:18:05 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson