Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It's not a law passed by Congress. It's regulations imposed by a federal agency.
1 posted on 10/04/2017 7:17:44 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

No more cow farts in California. . . .


2 posted on 10/04/2017 7:19:01 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Note to judge...NO.


3 posted on 10/04/2017 7:20:23 PM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
💨. I release a noxious gas in their general direction.
4 posted on 10/04/2017 7:20:27 PM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s not a law. Tell the judge to seal his sphincter to end his own methane emissions.


5 posted on 10/04/2017 7:20:30 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The administration is charged with enforcing law. If these are bureaucratic rules and not laws, Trump can laugh in their face.

And even if they were laws, he can prioritize enforcement any way he sees fit. Or, like Obama treated DOMA, he can determine the law is unconstitutional and refuse to enforce.

Give it up judge. You’re not the Chief Executive.


6 posted on 10/04/2017 7:22:24 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hahahaha, judge jerkoff! Try again, loser!


7 posted on 10/04/2017 7:25:19 PM PDT by W. (Trump: America's Churchill!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The Trump administration was ordered by a federal judge Wednesday to immediately enforce new restrictions on the release of potent methane emissions at oil and gas drilling operations on public land.

And how many DIVISIONS does this Federal "judge" command?

8 posted on 10/04/2017 7:26:37 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Trump won; we got Gorsuch and a bit of the MAGA agenda. But now the Swamp is back in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Do an Obama. Ignore it, and say you are studying how to implement it. The process will take a few years.


9 posted on 10/04/2017 7:26:38 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Who are these idiot judges who make rulings way beyond their knowledge or intelligence?


11 posted on 10/04/2017 7:32:51 PM PDT by beethovenfan (I always try to maximize my carbon footprint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

My wife is constantly trying to enforce methane restrictions on me.


12 posted on 10/04/2017 7:35:15 PM PDT by posterchild ("Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - R. Feynman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Clinton judge, former San Fran City attorney...


14 posted on 10/04/2017 7:39:26 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

NO. GTH.


17 posted on 10/04/2017 8:00:49 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is ridiculous. If DJT can be legally bound by actions taken by a previous administration, that means the previous administration still more powerful than the current one. Under no reading of the Constitution do directives from out-of-power administrations compel action on the part of successor administrations.


19 posted on 10/04/2017 8:13:38 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“It’s not a law passed by Congress. It’s regulations imposed by a federal agency.”

Since when have Democrats begun caring about mundane things like laws, or the Constitution?


21 posted on 10/04/2017 8:34:45 PM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
FINALLY! Someone is going after Hillary!


24 posted on 10/04/2017 8:58:05 PM PDT by Slyfox (Are you tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Just say no, my President. Agencies cannot make law even if they were created by Congress and all that happy stuff. And a judge should know that.


26 posted on 10/04/2017 9:56:51 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trump should enforce the ruling, but only in the states that insist it be enforced, thus not interfering in the activities in the states that are not part of the complaint, and meanwhile finish the work on revising the rule, to in effect nullify it.


28 posted on 10/05/2017 7:26:26 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson