Posted on 10/08/2017 5:10:02 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
Bookmark.
It’s like how FReepers figured out the “alt right” perps at Charlottesville were CIAState Dept employees from Obama’s era, fake protesters from Occupy and working for CNN...
I don’t buy anything the MSM tells us about the identity of the so called “Vegas shooter”... It’s all stagecraft.
I came across this you tube of a n excellent Forensic Analysis of the Audio tapes of the shooting and the result is pretty convincing with a gentle showing that math and physics with some analysis shows their were at least two shooters shooting from different distances...
Forensic acoustic proof of SECOND shooter in the La's Vegas massacre
TheHealthRanger
Published on Oct 9, 2017
Two shooters at least.
I worked in Reagan’s Western White House as a cook intern. There is a completely separate way to get around the entire hotel and towers and presidential suite without ever being in a public space, I can tell you that. The President and First Lady never appeared in public and ate in the best dining areas only when no one else was there. They used the hallways we service people used to get around, and they did have dogs checking everything out first.
Thanks Ernest.
But there is reason to doubt Mike Adams. If he's telling truth now, he's like the boy who cried "wolf!" due to past (carefully presented) wild claims, that he does excel at selling as legitimate. It's made himself a lot of money. The man is a dedicated salesman. There is no room for doubt about that.
In the video presentation ---
Did anyone else notice that this Mike Adams/Health Ranger guy said he obtained the recordings from internet videos (note the multiple) yet showed us just the one image purported to objective sound analysis?
In his theorizing he may be on to something regarding triangulation, yet he did not show a processed version of an alleged recording that actually showed (through this sound analysis technique) that there was a second shooter allegedly "overlapping" on the same tape (even though fairly early in the video, he said that he would show that - he never did).
In light of the sound recording that he included in the video demonstration, presence of a second shooter, along with the rest of the 250 yard hypothesis is coming out of thin air. At the least he's not showing the source for the second set of calculations upon which the 250 yard circle is based.
There was no indication from which particular youtube video he obtained (and allegedly used) the sound recording he claims he's expert regarding canceling out "background noise". These things are significant.
Can anyone show the man has sound engineering background? Has he claimed that among his many and varied claims he has made for himself (regarding himself) in the past? In his video, of course he represented himself merely as an experienced long-range shooter -- but then segued right into portraying himself as expert in canceling out background "noise".
Before anyone lets themselves get too deep into trusting this Mike Adams, The Health Ranger, check out these links;
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2011/06/23/scientology-and-mike-adams-it-all-become/ full title: Scientology, anti-psychiatry quackery, and Mike Adams: It all becomes clear now
SunkenCiv, and good 'ol Ernest_at_the_Beach may appreciate this next link;
in part because, in comments section is link to
that was posted by PZ Meyers. Does that name "PZ Meyers" ring any bells with you guys?
And this last that I'll include (that admittedly I don't know what to make of regarding the alleged-to-be actual quotes, that sounds a lot like satire itself, while presenting itself as admission from Adams that he engages in satire -- and keeps getting away with it) from a gal who bills herself as Scibabe;
Waveform Analysis - 3 Clips Las Vegas Shooting - One Shooter or Multiple Shooters?
Notice in the first video he mentions that some of the apparent change in sound of whatever weapon is firing is likely due to the microphone (in a cell phone) being moved resulting in the sound entering the microphone from a new, different angle.
All in all, he does leave it more than open that there was possibly more than one weapon being used simultaneously in one part that he covers-- iirc -- in the first video.
Nice post... looks like the killer might have been using service elevators.
Acoustic analysis clearly demonstrates the physical evidence of two sets of ballistics volleyed into the crowd from two different locations.
I have spent decades in the field of acoustics and when I heard the audio from the concert area I knew there were two different acoustic signatures. This guys analysis is right on and clearly shows, proves, there were two shooters.
(Spectrum image is file photo.)
No question there’s 2 shooters....but are they connected?
Do they know each other?
Thanks for the ping. I sensed an acoustic analysis of the shots would rule out an ‘echo’ explanation.
I am waiting, unless I missed it, evidence that tannerite was actually used in the ammo and that it’s purpose was to blow up the fuel tank. Such an event could have killed more at Mandalay than the number that died on 9-11.
Yes, motive is key here. And so far, zilch.
But adding credible acoustic analysis to firm up fact there was more than one shooter helps direct the overall investigation of motive.
Your assumption is that they want to investigate a second shooter.
Wouldn’t the bullet wounds prove or disprove the number of murderers? What about the unique markings on the bullets as they went through the barrel? Do the bullets match with the guns found in the room?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.