Baloney. Roberts’ point was that the ACA was a poorly written law and might collapse under its own weight, but that didn’t make it unconstitutional on the grounds that were the basis of the legal challenge before him.
Roberts talks in terms of “fixing” a law. But “fixing” a law isn’t the issue and is irrelevant - that’s why I said Roberts is devious.
“Striking down” an unconstitutional law IS relevant and IS the issue and Roberts is loathe to do that as he has repeatedly said.
The ACA is patently unconstitutional and regardless of the feckless SCOTUS, should be ignored and not enforced by POTUS or the states.