[Oldeconomybuyer]

Bias. Reuters hates capitalism, free markets, and of course President Trump.

[mewzilla]

Because single guys should be forced to buy maternity coverage!

[I want the USA back]

They can’t hold themselves back! On the 4th word in the headline, they started with the bias.

[trebb]

Yep - Trump doing what the Congress has worked so hard to prevent ever since they started insisting that insurers HAD to cover a litany of possible problems and provide a lot of "services" (giveaways) that people used to handle themselves without blinking any eye, and not tailor plans to meet people's needs.

When I was growing up, we still had doctors making house-calls...

[Enterprise]

Liberals are outraged! WINNING!

[stylin19a]

This sounds like the Bush small business insurance proposal. If this can be don via EO, why didn’t Pres. Bush do it ?

[libertylover]

The hatred just drips off the page.

[eyeamok]

essential health benefits such as maternity and newborn care, prescription drugs, and mental health and addiction treatment

Yep, something every couple in their late 50’s needs, especially if they are self employed,they forgot Gender Reassignment Surgery.

[Chauncey Gardiner]

“less benefits” = no mandatory tranny care, no maternity care for guys and older adults, no rectal repair coverage for Pelosi’s constituents, etc.

Just kidding on the last one... and yet reuters wants us to believe this is “bare bones”.

[TBP]

This merely enforces a pre-existing law by interpreting groups in a much broader way.

[Signalman]

Excellent!

[euram]

to many people, maternity care is not essential, nor is drug addiction treatment or mental health treatment. So why should they be required to pay for the kind of treatment that they don’t require?

[elpadre]

So us old folks and singles must buy labor and delivery services?? Obama says yes.