Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi urges new law to limit president's use of nuclear weapons
The Hill ^

Posted on 10/12/2017 1:11:20 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Sub-Driver

If we define publicly how and when will and won’t use nuclear weapons we set a framework of defense in public stone. It becomes a Maginot Line and wont’ work out any better than it did in 1939.


21 posted on 10/12/2017 1:22:23 PM PDT by arthurus (If we publicly define how and when we will use nuclear weapons we set the param)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Gee Nancy, you could have gotten all the laws you wanted passed when you had the usurper in office and you were the speaker. Now? Not so much.

So sit down, shut up and pay attention Nancy, you’re about to get schooled.


22 posted on 10/12/2017 1:22:30 PM PDT by Bullish (Whatever it takes to MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

If we define publicly how and when will and won’t use nuclear weapons we set a framework of defense in public stone. It becomes a Maginot Line and wont’ work out any better than it did in 1939.


23 posted on 10/12/2017 1:22:35 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt
new law to limit president's use of nuclear weapons

We are making progress - First we limit Pelosi's access to military aircraft to use them as her personal commute between DC and the Bay Area.

Step Two will be to eliminate her need to commute entirely.

24 posted on 10/12/2017 1:23:04 PM PDT by Dustoff45 (Pass the spicy catsup. We've got Trump now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: seawolf101

She is the most obvious one that Congressional Pharmacist was talking about.


25 posted on 10/12/2017 1:23:14 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

One idiotic issue is what if some country attacked us with chemical or biological weapons, the latter of which could be much more destructive than nukes?


26 posted on 10/12/2017 1:23:39 PM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hey, if you can remember your name after all the botox brain damage, nancy — why don’t you just do what you been trying incrementally for all these years??

Just pass a law declaring the United States Constitution illegal.


27 posted on 10/12/2017 1:23:48 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (ALL records destroyed/faked, books rewritten, statues renamed, dates altered and more.../1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It is a good rule of thumb to oppose anything Pelosi supports,.


28 posted on 10/12/2017 1:24:23 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thorvaldr

I don’t think that is a joke. She is visually going downhill. her gaps and lapses in speech remind me a lot of my mother a few months before we all finally realized she had to have constant tending.


29 posted on 10/12/2017 1:25:17 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The ‘woman’ is certifiable.


30 posted on 10/12/2017 1:25:45 PM PDT by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Should someone tell the stupid slattern that Kali, and her district, is an easier target for an ICBM than, say, DC? Is she going to be standing under it, to demonstrate her commitment?

Scroot. Send her on a "fact finding mission" to Seoul. The Word is that things are heating up, and everyone is on Standby...

31 posted on 10/12/2017 1:25:49 PM PDT by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z3n

>>This president, or any subsequent president, can’t just hit the big red button preemptively.<<

The USC Begs to differ. And, thank God, one POTUS did just that and saved millions of lives.


32 posted on 10/12/2017 1:28:03 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (ALL records destroyed/faked, books rewritten, statues renamed, dates altered and more.../1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Nancy’s caregiver is holding back her Aricept.


33 posted on 10/12/2017 1:28:10 PM PDT by Stormdog (A rifle transforms one from subject to Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hey Nancy, as soon as you can prove you know what planet you are currently on, maybe somebody will listen to you.


34 posted on 10/12/2017 1:28:16 PM PDT by caligatrux (Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

How about a law that requires public disclosure if anyone in Congress is being delivered Alzheimer’s drugs?


35 posted on 10/12/2017 1:31:44 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

I meant no one would be able to under her proposal... which is potentially untrue and the President still could do it if she got her way, it would just be ‘against the law’. heh ... unless the law actually implemented safeguards on ‘the football’ and other launch protocols


36 posted on 10/12/2017 1:32:00 PM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Lady, it's not President Trump using a nuclear bomb that you need to worry about.

It's that fat fire-plug running North Korea who's doing the saber rattling, threatening to annihilate the western US with one of his rockets and a warhead.

So who's ability to "protect and defend" are you hamstringing, Nancy? Your own president's or the threatening enemy?

37 posted on 10/12/2017 1:34:51 PM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Maybe she missed her dose of Alzheimer meds.


38 posted on 10/12/2017 1:35:55 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

And, “We must launch to see if it explodes!”


39 posted on 10/12/2017 1:37:51 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
What the hell is so concerning about not giving sand nazis nukes??

They swear a blood oath every day to murder us in any way possible!

I'm more concerned about them getting nukes in the first place!

40 posted on 10/12/2017 1:39:46 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (TETELESTI Read em and weep Lucy! Yer times almost up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson