Posted on 10/15/2017 8:40:22 AM PDT by ForYourChildren
“In the spring of 1971, I met a girl.” That’s how Bill Clinton began his speech at the Democratic National Convention. Many women across America thought, “Really? Which one?”
Now that women are coming out of the woodwork accusing Republican nominee Donald Trump of sexual abuse, the liberals are saying we should believe them, to listen to their stories.
I agree. But we should also listen to THESE women’s stories:
1. Three college students
In 1969, Bill Clinton was a 23-year-old Rhodes scholar at Oxford University when he was accused of sexual assault by a fellow student, an English woman named Eileen Wellstone, 19, after the two met at a local pub. Bill acknowledged that he had sex with this woman, but insists it was a consensual encounter.
An unidentified State Department employ filed a report of the incident at the time with his superiors. Now retired he said, “There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman had suffered severe emotional trauma…But we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the embarrassment of having a Rhodes scholar charged with rape.”
Charges were never brought against Clinton. He left Oxford one year later without earning his degree.
In 1972, a 22-year-old Yale student contacted campus police and accused Bill of sexual assault. He was dating Hillary Rodham at the time. Retired campus police have since confirmed the report. Again, no charges were filed.
{..snip..}
(Excerpt) Read more at patheos.com ...
"11 times Bill Clinton was accused of assault or rape: remember this when Dems say accusers should be believed"
This is a one year old article, July 27, 2016.
But for some reason it seems relevant for today.
Is this the president that Hillary is referring to regarding her comments the other day?
President Bill Clinton, President Rapist
bttt
If people thought the recording of billy bush and Trump was something, can you even imagine the conversations between billy boy and whine-stain?
Is this Weinstein or President Bill Clinton that the gal is talking about? The actions are so similar.
1. invite the gal to their hotel room
2. wear only a robe or small article of clothing
3. ask the girl for a sexual favor
4. FORCE yourself on the girl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Carolyn Moffet was a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979 when she was invited to Governor Clinton’s hotel room after a political fundraiser.
“I was escorted there by a state trooper. When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt,” she said. “He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it.
We should start always using the phrase “alleged rapists Harvey Weinstein and Bill Clinton”.
They both made payouts. Harvey didn’t have Hitlery heading up his Bimbo Eruption Department, so his payouts were much greater.
double standard ping
No love for Bill Clinton, but accusations that don’t result in convictions or settlements don’t mean anything.
“Innocent until proven guilty” applies to ALL for EVERYTHING.
Yeah, he was a lying, indiscriminate horndog, MOST politicians are pretty nasty examples of humankind, but still, *PROOF* that stands up in front of a jury or it’s just whining.
In short, I don’t care who accuses whom of what until proof that satisfies a jury is provided, no matter how liberal or conservative, treasonous or patriotic any of the players are.
Just my .02.
For future reference
The reason Madam Benghazi didn't comment on Weinstein's depravity until absolutely forced to do so, was because that type behavior is "everyday" in the clinton household.
Perhaps that little bimp Hillary got on her noggin after falling down the steps of Air Force One caused her to forget that.
And, mysteriously, several troopers and bodyguards "got dead".
Its a private matter, we are too prudish, let him who is without sin....
“Innocent until proven guilty” applies to ALL for EVERYTHING.
Yeah, he was a lying, indiscriminate horndog, MOST politicians are pretty nasty examples of humankind, but still, *PROOF* that stands up in front of a jury or it’s just whining.
In short, I don’t care who accuses whom of what until proof that satisfies a jury is provided, no matter how liberal or conservative, treasonous or patriotic any of the players are.
Just my .02.
I don't disagree. But with Clinton the real issue is not that we didn't convict a rapist, but that we elected one as President. We get to use a different standard for that.
you do realize that Clinton paid almost 800k to settle one of his cases?
Remember JUANITA BRODERICK!.....When Slick Willy said.....”put a little ice on that.”
Well said...and nails it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.