"He was as generous and warm and funny as a person could be. I just so appreciate all the time I got to spend with him," Kagan said six months after Scalia's death. "I miss him a lot."
I know I miss him, but I never had the pleasure of actually meeting him.
1 posted on
10/19/2017 11:14:24 AM PDT by
Sopater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: Sopater
The 2nd amendment is textually clear to me.
27 posted on
10/19/2017 12:20:10 PM PDT by
Joe Bfstplk
(A Texas Deplorable.)
To: Sopater
Kagan said. "Pretty much all of us now look at the text first and the text is what matters most." I don't think I believe her, but wouldn't it be nice if for once a liberal nominee became more conservative over time?
36 posted on
10/19/2017 12:56:51 PM PDT by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: Sopater
To: Sopater
38 posted on
10/19/2017 1:01:20 PM PDT by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: Sopater
Kagan explained that she believes the high court has two poles of judicial interpretation—Scalia and his strict textualism on one end, and Justice Stephen Breyer, who emphasizes a law's purpose and its real-world outcomes, on the other. Kagan said the court as a whole is much closer to Scalia's viewpoint. Really? So how come we know how every single dem appointed justice is going to rule on every case in advance simply by looking at the dem party position rather than the law? Hmmm?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson