and hoovering up millions of dollars in “donations”.....
Posted on 10/24/2017 12:32:15 AM PDT by Libloather
**SNIP**
“Let’s not mince words,” she said in Montreal. “This is a new cold war and it’s just getting started ... We are in a global struggle between liberal democracy and a rising tide of illiberalism, authoritarianism and dictatorship.
“That illiberalism comes in many strains, including in Russia’s aggressive efforts to destabilize — if not dismantle — the liberal world order.”
The antidote, Clinton claims, is the “wave of activism” she said is inspiring her in the U.S. and around the world.
(Excerpt) Read more at thestar.com ...
Full title - Hillary Clinton tells Montreal audience ‘wave of activism’ can defeat forces trying to destroy democracies
yeah, not long ago Shrillary was sucking up to Putin with a “reset” ... giving away our uranium supplies.... and hoovering up millions of dollars in “donations”..... she’s just the person to tell us what we should do.... NOT.
Warmongering lying whore. Thanks Libloather.
Biggest mistake Trump made was saying he would not go after Hillary for her crimes.
From now on, no Presidential election will ever be final.
I wonder if they are putting the heat on her in other ways. Cash going into the Clinton Foundation has slowed to a trickle. They had to redo taxes for several years awhile back and the foundation is likely under increased scrutiny. She seems to be working fairly hard pushing this book and trashing Trump. She won't get many $4K handshakes in flyover country, and that is why she took her carnival act to England and Canada. In years past she could cobble a book together and have unions buy it in bulk for some easy cash.
Hillary KNOWS about the Antifa Civil War planned for November 4th and the November 8th protests.
She is going to try to take credit for these upcoming events.
Just imagine if she had this much energy then. We might be calling her madam Cankles.
Of course we never get to see her walking to the interview chair.
She is, of course, wrong, on so many levels. Primarily, the recent uptick in activism among progressives is the quivering of the movement in its death throes. Nov 4 will drive a spike into the heart of the beast. Wooden stakes dipped in holy water and silver bullets are at the ready.
He doesn’t have to now, others will do it for him and besides, that was in reference to the e-mail scandal but as long as any limitations of statutes is not eclipsed, ha can change his mind or rather the prosecutors can.
To me, there is no gray area of her violation of the Espionage Act. As a former cryprto repair tech in the military, the rules are very specific as are the penalties.
But, the current track we are starting to see goes far more to the core of the people to understand in the Uranium 1 scandal. Benedict Arnold was a piker compared to the Clintons and their whole charade right now is to start the Sluts and Nuts deflections as they have always done.
The big difference is we now have a leader who doesn’t suffer fools lightly. They have nothing anymore and Trump knows it. Just start with the Chinese water torture and watch it all fall apart just as the Tower of Babel.
I am thankful she didn’t campaign as hard as she is promoting her book. I wonder if her book tour will take her to the “rust- belt” states that she chose to ignore during her failed race for the White House. Perhaps President Trump should invite her to hold a book signing at the White House and remind her that it will be the only invitation she will get for the next eight years.
Who is she kidding? In her perfect world SHE would be a dictator and anyone who dares to disagree with her or speak negatively of her would be sent to the gulag or lined up against the wall and shot.
Does she have to go through Customs when she slithers back into the United States? Back when Obama ruled, someone like Lois Lerner with Customs would have been waiting for outspoken political “Résistance” enemies at whatever checkpoint they would be passing through.
Let's be clear: that only applies to Republican presidents.
The next election that chooses a Democrat president may turn out to be very final. I wouldn't be surprised if the next time a Democrat president is elected, the Democrats start looking for ways to prevent another Presidential election. I'm a little surprised they didn't try that with Obama, to be honest.
Which the American people stopped on November 8, 2016.
I thought Obama had stopped the rising of the tides?!
Has her lengthy, world-wide “book tour” spent all the book profits yet? Or is this considered Clinton Foundation charitable work?
Let's be clear: that only applies to Republican presidents.From now on, no Presidential election will ever be final.
ObviouslyThe next election that chooses a Democrat president may turn out to be very final. I wouldn't be surprised if the next time a Democrat president is elected, the Democrats start looking for ways to prevent another Presidential election. I'm a little surprised they didn't try that with Obama, to be honest.
There’s that sticky Electoral College thing to consider . . . even if there were no presidential election, the state governments could name their own slates of electors. Contrary to popular opinion, the state legislatures and not the people or the federal government control the selection of the electors; they could use a game of chance to pick them if they wanted to.So a pretext to call off the popular election would not suffice; it would have to be an outright, in-your-face coup.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
