Skip to comments.
Full DC Circuit reinstates order requiring government to allow teen immigrant to get an abortion
ABA Journal ^
| October 24, 2017
| DEBRA CASSENS WEISS
Posted on 10/24/2017 2:43:26 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
PDF of the Court's decision is
here.
To: Lurking Libertarian
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
OK, put her over the border tonight.
3
posted on
10/24/2017 2:45:51 PM PDT
by
Mouton
(The MSM is a clear and present danger to the republic.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Is the court saying if you can get into the US you can demand any medical procedure? Do we taxpayers have to pony up?
4
posted on
10/24/2017 2:47:16 PM PDT
by
notaliberal
(St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle,)
To: Lurking Libertarian
Do what Mexico would do in this situation.. BILL HER HOME COUNTRY FOR IT.
5
posted on
10/24/2017 2:53:57 PM PDT
by
CivilWarBrewing
(Feminism DESTROYED females)
To: Lurking Libertarian
“A Constitutional right to an abortion”. I don’t think I’ve seen that phrase before. Roe v. Wade found that the government could not prohibit you from getting an abortion, but did not impose on the government an obligation to make sure you get one as a matter of right.
To: JewishRighter
You got it.
They just made up a new right if this holds.
But the larger question is...what Constitutional right does an illegal alien have in the first place?
Aliens only have the rights extended to them by Congress.
Treating her as a citizen is an affront to our Constitution.
7
posted on
10/24/2017 2:57:35 PM PDT
by
Regulator
To: notaliberal
Is the court saying if you can get into the US you can demand any medical procedure? Do we taxpayers have to pony up? Next up will be illegals DEMANDING free birth control pills and Viagra. Of course, maybe we're already giving them that, too...?
8
posted on
10/24/2017 2:59:47 PM PDT
by
workerbee
(America finally has an American president again.)
To: JewishRighter
Roe v. Wade found that the government could not prohibit you from getting an abortion, but did not impose on the government an obligation to make sure you get one as a matter of right. The problem is the government is preventing her from exercising her "right".
9
posted on
10/24/2017 3:00:37 PM PDT
by
semimojo
To: Regulator
How many weeks has this gone on now, while the poor innocent baby has been growing?
I bet the fiends are clawing over each to other to be the one who gets to do the deed.
10
posted on
10/24/2017 3:01:40 PM PDT
by
workerbee
(America finally has an American president again.)
To: notaliberal
Do we taxpayers have to pony up?According to the article, she has obtained financing for it herself.
To: Lurking Libertarian
So let me get this progression straight. Women have a right to abortion. On demand. Regardless of term of pregnancy. And it is Constitutional. And the taxpayers have to pay for it. And it applies to anyone who manages to get into this country, legally or illegally. And you better not bitch about any of this or you are a racist or something.
Liberals.
12
posted on
10/24/2017 3:03:45 PM PDT
by
fhayek
To: Lurking Libertarian
This illegal alien invader comes to the USA so that Citizens here can pay to murder her child. Something is wrong with this picture.
13
posted on
10/24/2017 3:04:28 PM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: Lurking Libertarian
Yes, I read that too, but knowing the courts, taxpayers will have to “pony up” when the illegal sues for us to pay for it
14
posted on
10/24/2017 3:07:57 PM PDT
by
notaliberal
(St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle,)
To: Lurking Libertarian
15
posted on
10/24/2017 3:08:55 PM PDT
by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
To: workerbee
That was my next comment.
Let’s ask the B**ch judge if she’d be free to do the deed.
A 15 week old kid is not a “mass of cells” as this moron lawyer thinks. Or maybe she just doesn’t give a crap.
I read the “opinion”. She mentioned the “child”. Thought she was talking about the baby.
Nope. Was the little puta who jumped the border, and wants to kill her kid with an American “doctor”.
To: semimojo
The problem is the government is preventing her from exercising her "right".
No, her decision to come to America unaccompanied and under age is preventing her from violating STATE LAW!
This stupid illegal should have crossed the border in California, where she would be living in an apartment overlooking some beautiful ocean bay (on tax payer dime), enjoying the recent dismantling of her child from within her belly (unlike in Texas, this too would be on tax payer dime)!
But, I digress. It is HER actions that are causing this prevention, not the Government. They are following the damn law...unlike this girl!
17
posted on
10/24/2017 3:19:06 PM PDT
by
ExTxMarine
(Diversity is tolerance; diverse points of views will not be tolerated!)
To: CivilWarBrewing
The Mexicans have invaded our country and taken over.
And not a shot was fired!
18
posted on
10/24/2017 3:23:05 PM PDT
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: ExTxMarine
preventing her from violating STATE LAW!According to the court's opinion, she got an order from a Texas state judge allowing her to get the abortion.
To: Lurking Libertarian
So is she paying for it or some charity and not the taxpayers? She crossed the border a month ago so she was already pregnant then. Coming for her freebies and her “constitutional right”. These people and our judges are treating us citizens as second class.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson