To: davikkm
He is right. He didn’t hire them; his paralegal did.
To: dan on the right
He is right. He didn’t hire them; his paralegal did.
All outsourced by the office manager.
8 posted on
10/25/2017 6:03:37 AM PDT by
ptsal
( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
To: dan on the right
Nothing to see here, lawyer-client privilege. Nothing to see... Please disperse
10 posted on
10/25/2017 6:06:50 AM PDT by
C210N
(It is easier to fool the people than convince them that they have been fooled)
To: dan on the right
He is right. He didn’t hire them; his paralegal did.
Yep. Get ready for another: “It depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is”
11 posted on
10/25/2017 6:10:55 AM PDT by
lodi90
To: dan on the right
I would not be surprised if he was leaning on a Clintonism just like that.
28 posted on
10/25/2017 6:47:38 AM PDT by
Titus-Maximus
(It doesn't matter who votes for whom, it only matters who counts the votes - Joe Stalin)
To: dan on the right
A fine example of Clinton speak parsing.
33 posted on
10/25/2017 7:20:37 AM PDT by
shotgun
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson