Posted on 10/27/2017 5:40:37 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
Hillary Claims She Didn’t Know About the Dossier – But Posted 8 Tweets Related to Dossier Before Election
Hillary Clinton sent out 8 tweets about Trump’s relationship with Russia leading up to election day in anticipation of the release of the Russia dossier.
She was preparing the public for the Russian narrative plot she had been working on with Fusion GPS and dossier author Christopher Steele.
The FBI launched their Trump-Russia probe in late July of 2016. Per a Politico report from March of 2017:
FBI Director James Comey told lawmakers Monday that his agency has been investigating possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russian officials since last July.
Shortly after the FBI launched a probe into Trump-Russia connections, Hillary Clinton mysteriously started tweeted about Trump-Russia connections.
Right on cue….
Hillary Clinton’s first tweet about Trump and Russia was sent on August 6th, 2016 with a caption, “Seriously, what is going on with Trump and Russia?”
Seriously, what is going on with Trump and Russia? https://t.co/N6ySNILYMx
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) August 6, 2016
The very next day August 7th, 2016 Hillary tweeted, “We have some questions about Donald Trump’s cozy relationship with Russia”
We have some questions about @realDonaldTrump‘s cozy relationship with Russia. https://t.co/aetHzJyJCo
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) August 8, 2016
On August 15th, 2016 Hillary tweeted the same Trump-Russia propaganda video with the caption, “We have some questions about Donald Trump’s cozy relationship with Russia.”
We have some questions about Donald Trump’s cozy relationship with Russia. https://t.co/N6ySNILYMx
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) August 15, 2016
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
One of the big mysteries of the whole Dossier Scam is that the dossier itself failed to be released to the public during the election cycle.
Two possible reasons:
1.Hillary/DNC expected to hide the fact that it was a document that they paid for from the public. And to hide that fact forever,
As a result they had to rely on Steele or some other 3rd party to do the dirty work of getting the document leaked. Steele was chosen and he failed to come through.
2. A less likely scenario: The Dossier was always intended to support an expanded FISA Warrent Program and not necessarily intended for a public release - a release that would immediately raise the “Who Paid For This” question and put Hillary in danger of exposure as the funding source.
Just mt opinion.
That effing xunt dragged the entire country through hell with he nachinations. LOCK HER UP.
:-)
Will ANY in the Obama Admin ever be held legally accountable for their criminality???
She even mentioned Russia/Trump in one of her debates, to start the ball rolling and put it in people’s minds.
“The Dossier was always intended to support an expanded FISA Warrent Program and not necessarily intended for a public release...”
I’m absolutely certain that is the case. The “dossier” is amateurish and absurd and would never hold up to public scrutiny. Its purpose was to justify America’s intelligence organizations being used to spy on the political opposition. This is the real crime here.
All of this makes a lot more sense when you consider that Obama and Clinton were sure they could steal the election. No one ever expected that there would be an actual justice department looking into these matters at a later date.
It’s clear that at least someone at the FBI alerted Hillary to the investigation, or Hillary ordered the FBI to investigate.
Either way, it’s just more proof that the FBI investigation into Hillary and her server were a farce.
Guess the FBI doesn’t care about National Security or Treason.
“Its purpose was to justify America’s intelligence organizations being used to spy on the political opposition. This is the real crime here.”
Yes. In the discussions I’ve heard, people get lost in the weeds of minutiae. THIS is the story; everything else is a byproduct — a distraction.
OH y’all do know that Hilliary does not actually post her own tweets, don’t you? She did tell herself Happy Birthday which is just a little weird. Or someone else posts for her.
(I’m just waiting for Hill to declare that she has peons posting for her.)
Herself is a drag on the party
The party will take her out
Herself is a drag on the party
The party will take her out
“The Dossier was always intended to support an expanded FISA Warrent Program and not necessarily intended for a public release...”
I’m absolutely certain that is the case. The “dossier” is amateurish and absurd and would never hold up to public scrutiny. Its purpose was to justify America’s intelligence organizations being used to spy on the political opposition. This is the real crime here.
All of this makes a lot more sense when you consider that Obama and Clinton were sure they could steal the election. No one ever expected that there would be an actual justice department looking into these matters at a later date.”
BINGO! We have a winner!
Hillary has people to send out tweets.
Sometimes I wish Trump did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.