[Oldeconomybuyer]

[SoFloFreeper]

Jen. You’re such a bigot. Our diversity makes us great, remember?

Now go to a mosque of your choice and listen to all the wonderful diverse opinions there.

[a fool in paradise]

More advice to the GOP from the Libs?

[a fool in paradise]

So Jenny Rubin LIKES the muslim Islamists who not only criminalized homosexuality but are killing homosexuals?

[tennmountainman]

They did oppose him.
The GOP spent 30 million opposing Moore.

[catnipman]

“However, a ray of sunshine peaked out from the gloom on the topic of Moore. Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) announced he wouldn’t support Moore”

uh, that’s lame duck Jeff Flake, right Jenn? The Jeff Flake who just burned all his Republican bridges forever? THAT, Jeff Flake, Jenn? THAT’S your “ray of sunshine”?

ROTFLOL!!!

[TexasFreeper2009]

lol

More lie... if Democrats can’t oppose sanctuary city mayors, governors, and Senators they are headed for extinction!

[Ohioan]

Smug stupidity! The women apparently believes that offering ex cathedra conclusions--unsupported by evidence--proves her point.

I believe that Miss Rubin fits the definition of a Trump hater. Here is What Drives The Trump Haters.

[foreverfree]

Bump

[UnwashedPeasant]

"If Republicans can’t oppose Roy Moore, they’re headed for extinction"

Yeah, we need a mainstream common-sense Republican to bring people together. Thanks, Washington Post!

[jmaroneps37]

She is a rare combination of truly ugly and truly stupid. Only the Wapo would pay her to write for them.

[1Old Pro]

Shouldn’t she be more concerned whether Democrats oppose their party leader Hillary for her crimes?

[central_va]

Patriots are taking the party back so that is a bad thing to this WaPo leftest ugly whore bag.

[editor-surveyor]

.
What an ignorant crotch pocket she is!

Roy Moore and a couple of dozen clones of him are the GOP’s only hope!
.

[Redleg Duke]

Compost...again.

[chesley]

Well, I’m an Alabaman. If Moore is no more unfit to be a Senator than Trump is to be President, then he’s gonna be pretty good in the Senate.

I’m voting for him.

[Jim Noble]

Jennifer Rubin is like a cartoon character.

[central_va]

You just know if she didn’t pluck daily she would become a uni-brow in no time.

[loveliberty2]

Rubin and the Progressives in both Parties who oppose the right of citizens who hold on to their right to freely express their deeply-held beliefs while they serve in positions of trust are wrong. In fact they are so wrong that they would surely reject James Madison, commonly-referred-to-"Father," of the Constitution of the United States of America:

Excerpt: "Because we hold it for a fundamental and undeniable truth, “that Religion or the duty which we owe to our Creator and the Manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence.”

"The Religion then of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man; and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate. This right is in its nature an unalienable right. It is unalienable; because the opinions of men, depending only on the evidence contemplated by their own minds, cannot follow the dictates of other men: It is unalienable also; because what is here a right towards men, is a duty towards the Creator. It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage, and such only, as he believes to be acceptable to him. This duty is precedent both in order of time and degree of obligation, to the claims of Civil Society. Before any man can be considered as a member of Civil Society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governor of the Universe: And if a member of Civil Society, who enters into any subordinate Association, must always do it with a reservation of his duty to the general authority; much more must every man who becomes a member of any particular Civil Society, do it with a saving of his allegiance to the Universal Sovereign. We maintain therefore that in matters of Religion, no man’s right is abridged by the institution of Civil Society, and that Religion is wholly exempt from its cognizance." - James Madison

Is there anywhere a clearer statement of the underlying principle of the U. S. Constitution's provisions and protections for "the People's" rights and liberties?

The very foundation of the Founders' Declaration of Independence from a "government-over-people" rule to one of a people's recognition of "overruling Providence" and "people-over-government" liberty was summarized in Jefferson's, "The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them."

In our generation, do we not see that "hand of force" unmasked at the same time as that same "hand" not only is reluctant to recognize Madison's "Creator," "the Governor of the Universe," and "Universal Sovereign," or Jefferson's "the God who gave us life," but utilizes that "hand of force" to deny public discourse to include those descriptions in its "politically-correct" discourse or teaching of the youth of America?

[Dalberg-Acton]

Thank God the wise and beneficent Jennifer Rubin has seen fit to grace us with her concern. </barf>

[Deplorable American1776]

Because Republicans elected Roy Moore instead of Strange, we are going extinct? No, only RINOs will be going extinct. Of course, you wouldn’t be worried if RINOs were winning...