Really your posts are some of the most rediculous I’ve seen here. I’m supposed to be a lyncher because I weight the evidence before me and come to the conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK? If you cannot discern the difference between a conversation about a suspect who’s been dead for over half a century, which carries no legal weight and offers no punishment besides public opinion, and a live one today who is entitled to due process of law, then you have issues larger than I can address over the internet.
you did more than give an opinion.
you asserted LHO was guilty.
you did this without the benefit of a trial.
how is this different from the rationale of a lynch mob.
when justice is concerned, the time variable is not relevant.
innocent until proven guilty (no expiration date, no invalidation upon death of the accused)
understand?