Posted on 10/30/2017 11:11:02 AM PDT by jazusamo
Edited on 10/30/2017 12:24:21 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
A House Democrat plans to propose an amendment to the Constitution that would limit presidential pardoning authority in the wake of three Trump campaign aides facing indictments in the special counsel investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Under Rep. Steve Cohen
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
LOL you have about 10 years to finish failed process?
While he is at it, maybe make it retroactive, which would invalidate the pardon Bill Clinton gave to his brother.
This guy even looks like a LOON no less act like one.
Where do the democrats find these idiots? under rocks?
Good luck. I might be OK with it if there is a sentence in the amendment with term limits for Representatives and Senators.
The people who elect these Azzhats need therapy!
yes because 2/3’s of all the STATES will approve a US Constitutional amendment, just to get back at Trump
After being approved by 3/4 of each house of congress.
Whatever....Yuh stew pet, nut case, dilettante....
You need a butterfly net
It takes three fourths of the states.
I propose a Constitutional amendment outlawing Democrats.
“Even if there was an appetite for it, the average length of time to get a Constitutional Amendment approved is eight years”
If you exclude the 27th amendment it’s a lot less.
https://introductorystats.wordpress.com/2011/02/02/a-statistical-look-at-the-ammendments-to-the-united-states-constitution/
3/4
3/4
Trump would be working on his Presidential library by the time if made it through the process. ............................... and with Chelsea Clinton in office there would be no need for it. When Trump Jr takes the WH back, they will re introduce it. (Dream scenario, maybe a nightmare one?)
There is no limit to the depths of unreasonableness that LIB lunatics will go. None. Not only are they all lunatics...most are criminal nitwits.
I would vote for that.
Exactly...not going to happen. Just another smoke screen.
The stupid is thick with this one.
At least he is following the correct Constitutional prescription.
Most Libs would just have some judge out there make a blatantly unconstitutional ruling.
My favorite cartoon almost ever. Brilliant.
Could this be a tacit admission that there will never be another Democratic president?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.