To: Sopater
One small issue that seems to be universally ignored is that the federal government has absolutely no constitutional authority to prohibit drugs in the first place. The constitution imbues the Federal Government with the power to protect the United States from enemies, foreign and domestic. Drugs fall into that category.
17 posted on
11/02/2017 12:22:55 PM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: DiogenesLamp
Whats to stop them from declaring you that enemy? Nice conservative answer. Who needs stinking checks and balances? Its too damned hard to run a police state and try to stay within Constitutional limitations!
18 posted on
11/02/2017 12:30:17 PM PDT by
antidisestablishment
( We few, we happy few, we basket of deplorables)
To: DiogenesLamp
The constitution imbues the Federal Government with the power to protect the United States from enemies, foreign and domestic. Drugs fall into that category.
The hell they do. You could say that about tobacco and anything else, too. It's absurd.
19 posted on
11/02/2017 12:31:48 PM PDT by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: DiogenesLamp
The constitution imbues the Federal Government with the power to protect the United States from enemies, foreign and domestic. Drugs fall into that category. That's certainly a broad, Hamiltonian view of the boundaries of the Constitution. Inanimate objects, wholly without life, even, can actually be considered "enemies" of a state?
To: DiogenesLamp
You just threw a lot of your previous anti-drug arguments in the crapper.
91 posted on
11/02/2017 6:02:15 PM PDT by
gundog
(Hail to the Chief, bitches.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson