Posted on 11/03/2017 7:58:42 AM PDT by fwdude
The tidal wave of sex abuse claims by women against powerful men in Hollywood might suggest that the industry is run by a cabal of heterosexual predators, and it’s good some are being exposed.
But which other group of sexual deviants ACTUALLY dominates Tinseltown? And has been cramming their political agenda into almost every film of the past decade? And assuring that the most envelope-pushing ones (e.g. Brokeback Mountain) always receive the highest industry awards?
If anyone really believes that Kevin Spacey’s alleged sex assault of the teenaged Anthony Rapp (to whom Spacey has apologized but claims he can’t remember) is a Hollywood rarity, or that the “gay” abuse scorecard is just a sidebar to the “larger” heterosexual abuse story, then I’ve got a Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act I’d like to sell you.
Sorry, is that too obscure a reference for you? It shouldn’t be, since the Matthew Shepard “hate crime” on which America’s federal hate crime laws are based was a far bigger and more consequential hoax than that of con-man George C. “I’ve got a bridge to sell you” Parker’s frequent “sale” of the Brooklyn Bridge to gullible marks. And when we’re talking about the political shielding of Hollywood chickenhawks from exposure and accountability, we’re talking about world-class powers of deception and fraud few groups possess.
Matthew Shepard was the young homosexual man (age 21 but looked 14) whose brutal murder in 1998 – supposedly by “homophobic bigots” – was cynically exploited by the Democrat Party and its powerful “gay” activist constituency. They used it to push through the novel and constitutionally corrosive idea – now a federal law! – that a perpetrator’s malice toward a victim’s “sexual orientation” should earn him more punishment than if he harms a non-homosexual. That criminalization of speech-when-connected-with-a-violent-crime was step one of a multi-part strategy to eventually criminalize ALL stand-alone speech critical of homosexuality as “hate speech” (which is still on their agenda).
The “gay” movement and its co-conspirators milked the Matthew Shepard hoax for a decade until a renegade “gay” journalist let the public in on the secret that Shepard was not an innocent college student murdered by “homophobes,” but a meth-addicted “gay” prostitute slaughtered by a couple of his meth-dealing sex partners.
Speaking of milk, let’s not forget that “gay” icon Harvey Milk – whose ugly mug has been immortalized on a US Postage Stamp, and for whom a US Navy ship is named – was a known pederast who preyed on teen boys. How did that little fact escape public scrutiny? Hmmm. According to another “gay” writer, Milk was even connected to infamous “Jonestown” cult leader Jim Jones (also a pederast).
There have been many teachable moments in recent years when the public could have been educated about the America’s pederast underworld: the Catholic priest scandal, the John DuPont “Foxcatcher” scandal, the Jerry Sandusky scandal, the Denny Hastert scandal, The Terrence “Terry” Bean scandal, the Portland Mayor Sam Adams scandal, the Seattle Mayor Ed Murray scandal, and on and on and on.
What do these seemingly unrelated stories have in common with the Spacey scandal? They each involve a conspiracy of Democrat political strategists, media gate-keepers and “gay” activists to hide the significant correlation of “gay” male culture and pederasty from the public. In the Spacey and Milk cases, they also knowingly lionize and elevate men who “allegedly” prey on boys to positions of great influence in society.
This conspiracy, which protects and advances all aspects of the LGBT agenda, not just pederasty, greatly affects all Americans because it has literally reshaped our society over the past half-century. To the extend that their deception has changed laws and public policy it amounts to fraud in furtherance of felony malfeasance.
So to just what extent does their deception affect public policy? If the Matthew Shepard federal hate law isn’t consequential enough for you, how about the creation of false, legally baseless “constitutional right” to homosexual “marriage” in Obergefell v Hodges? That was only possible through the judicial malfeasance of leftist Supreme Court justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan, who were both guilty of actual (not merely perceived) conflict of interest by voting for that result despite having performed “gay marriages” during the pendency of the case: the most blatant and egregious violation of judicial ethics in the history of the court.
Ginsberg and Kagan’s judicial activism is not as clear an example of fraud as it is of abuse of power, until you recognize all the steps of the LGBT conspiracy to deceive the public along the way. We’re talking decades of strategic planning and implementation.
First, it required a suppression of the roots of the modern “gay” movement itself, which was (and is) steeped in pederasy (man/boy sex), closely linked with Nazism, and, in more recent decades, responsible for triggering the global – and globally lethal – GRIDS renamed AIDS crisis (“gay” men remaining by far the #1 source of new cases even today according to the CDC). Raise any one of those three thoroughly documented (ultra-consequential) facts and watch your life and reputation be destroyed by the leftist smear machine.
Second, it required the complete corruption of academia and the scientific community on the question of the normalcy and health consequences of homosexual conduct (which began with the “gay” takeover of the APA in 1973). Today’s strictly enforced, punishment-backed, uniformity of agreement among academics and professionals is alone evidence of their success in that. The breathtaking extent of their fraud in their process of achieving that is detailed by Dr. Jeffrey Satinover in his eye-opening expose “The Trojan Couch: How the Mental Health Associations Misrepresent Science.”
Third, it required the total corruption of journalistic integrity in the mainstream media on issues related to the LGBT agenda. Today, that transformation is so complete that every assertion of the LGBT lobby is simply assumed as fact in mainstream news stories and pro-family disagreement is equated – literally – with Nazi opinion about Jews.
Lastly, it required massive corruption of judicial integrity in US courts, which the 98% heterosexual majority could once count on to preserve the primacy of marriage and the natural family in mainstream culture. Judicial corruption was ensured by homosexualist Anthony Kennedy who wrote all five majority opinions of the Supreme Court establishing “gay” cultural supremacy in America, beginning with the ruling in Romer v Evans that characterized political efforts to oppose special rights for homosexuals as “hate based” and thus illegitimate. Today, nearly all cases related to the LGBT agenda in the lower courts are funneled to activist homosexual judges whose lack of impartiality in their foregone conclusions is not even questioned, let alone considered a basis for recusal.
This is all to explain why one of the largest networks of pederasts in America – the Chickenhawks of Hollywood, has not yet been exposed and might never be, despite the heroism of survivors like Corey Feldman. After all, in the world of deception, illusion and deflection, who is better than Hollywood?
But make no mistake, if the full exposure of the Hollywood heterosexual scandal would amount to four alarm blaze, the full exposure of Hollywood’s pederasts – the elite of “gay” male culture – would be like the conflagration of Rome.
For those who pooh pooh the criticisms of the homosexual "rights" movement as "irrelevant to our lives," this article should be an eye opener. It's as relevant to every American as Islamic terrorism.
Dems all.
True. That goes without saying.
Most people are guessing same person on this one:
http://blindgossip.com/?p=88044#more-88044
[Blind Gossip] Guess which director is in a panic now? No, we’re not talking about Brett Ratner, whose own world was just rocked by allegations of bad behavior.
We hear that another famous movie director is rallying a defense team right now because he believes that years of misogyny are about to blow up in his face and completely transform his career
Calls to investigate Hollywood in congressional hearings
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3601197/posts
I reposted some comments from voat and from Breitbart that might be of interest.
Let’s not forget Jesse Dirkhising, RIP.
This one has mixed guesses
http://blindgossip.com/?p=88057#more-88057
[Blind Gossip] Aspiring actors take acting classes to learn how to act. But what if the teacher of those classes has his own twisted agenda?
This very well-known actor stars in both film and TV projects. He teaches acting on the side.
We’re being told that some very questionable activity goes on in his acting classes. Here are some examples from former students:
The first day of class, he told us to take off all our clothes so we could learn how to be comfortable being vulnerable in front of the camera.
He says the sex scenes are “art” and that if you want to be a real “artist” you have to be comfortable with taking your clothes off and having sex on camera.
He uses the class as his own personal casting couch for him and his friends. He introduces you to his other “teacher” friends or his “producer” friends who pretend to want to help you with your craft or with getting roles, but they always just want to have sex.
He has you take your clothes off, and he takes his clothes off, too. If you don’t do the fake sex scene with him, he will throw you out out of class.
I’ve been on film sets before and unless you are doing p*rn, there is absolutely no reason for actors to be totally nude. We should have had pasties or c*ck socks. The whole thing just felt wrong.
One day it got so creepy that our entire class walked out.
He offers some of the female students roles in unpaid films. You show up on the set and you have to sign an NDA. Then he tells you – surprise! – you need to do an improvised sex scene with him. If you refuse, you get fired, and because you have an NDA, you can’t tell anyone about it.
He had the women on the set of [name of film] wear dental dams, and not in their mouths. You shouldn’t have to wear a dental dam for a simulated sex scene.
Some of the kids in the class are only 17 or 18 years old and are very naive and just want to make it in the business. He’s famous so they just do what he tells them. I think he counts on this to take advantage of them.
Some of the students complained to the school about him and his friends and what they were forcing the students to do, but the school just kicked out the students.
This doesn’t sound like an acting school. This sounds like a hunting ground.
There is so much truth in what Scott Lively says, but it is also a shame that it will never reach, never be read by a very significant number of Americans and not even likely to get an “honorable mention” on any Fox cable or broadcast program.
Who ?
Sadly, not even the traditionally mainstream Conservative groups talk about the homosexual threat anymore. I heard that the FRC’s “Values Voter Summit” last month bare featured any speakers at all who condemned the homosexual agenda, notably the redefinition/undefinition of marriage by demand of the sodomites. I think my friend Brian Camenker of MassResistance was the only one.
Thanks for posting
Why don’t the students past and present get a lawyer and file a class action suit against the school and “teachers”? And can an NDA be enforced if someone was criminally violated?
That is a sicko....hope he’s exposed soon.
I think you will see suits as this blows up.
But look at James Woods.
he has the money to get blacklisted
Most don’t.
Most want to keep the gravy train running
Insider who posts here told a story about a party. The guy admitted his public comments were made because he was trying to pitch a project to a super liberal Exec.
Here's praying Hollywood falls fast
Everyone’s too busy slobbering over Milo.
Mercer cut Milo and Bannon loose yesterday
Not sure what is coming down or the mechanics in selling breitbart to daughters and resigning from Hedgefund..as in future liability
take a wild guess based on clues in this:
“We hear that another famous movie director is rallying a defense team right now because he believes that years of misogyny are about to blow up in his face and completely transform his career”
Hmm. Transformers director? He’d be quickly tossed aside if true as he’s a conservative politically.
There was one that led people to believe Cameron.Someone here pointed out he recently moved to New Zealand
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.