Posted on 11/06/2017 4:03:31 AM PST by ETL
Here you go. You already know this if you read the thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3602093/posts?page=51#51
this post really started the analysis.
Texas does have broader rights for armed citizens than many states. I have seen cases of people going to jail for YEARS when in Texas they would walk free
I had the same problem, until a friend recommended this: the Handi-Racker - http://www.handi-racker.com/
It has allowed me to continue using and enjoying my semi-autos.
My impression was that the reload was at the time Willeford engaged. Hopefully we’ll see.
Actually it is "Courts Martial" 🤡
Cheap too. Double 00 is not cheap nor are slugs. Lot of YouTube videos show how deadly the waxer rounds are.
You are forgetting the ultimate Texas defense; The somebitch needed killing.
Yeah, looks like you're right. Could have sworn I heard or read somewhere that he had reloaded after the chase as well. Guess I was mistaken.
Trump: thankfully someone had a gun shooting in the opposite direction. Couldn’t have said it better. That is why I go to church armed. One of the very few. Thankfully last night our pastor said that it was high time that we took security of our church seriously. I brought this up several years ago to our deacons and our then pastor. The pastor blew me off, saying nothing was going to happen. Thankfully now maybe we can set up a security program for Sunday and Wednesdays. I volunteered before to run it, and this Wednesday evening I will once again tell our new pastor that I will run it if they want me too. I pray to GOD in heaven that THIS TIME someone listens.
I took a look at your posting history. All I can say is, seek help.
If he was dishonorably discharged, it was against the law for him to have a gun. Surely the family and friends knew that. Why didn’t they report him when they saw the photo?
In Texas it’s up to the church whether or not guns are banned as it’s private property and I read that church did in fact ban them and the killer knew that. Matter of fact the NY Post reported today he killed his wifes grandmother in that shooting.
http://nypost.com/2017/11/06/texas-shooter-killed-wifes-grandmother-in-massacre/
But I agree with your point. The left owns this. Just as Obama created an environment where cop killing became a crisis, the left’s hate for Christians that supported Trump could be responsible for this.
BYW, where are HG’s aka Chester the molester, daughters nude pics on FR, inquiring minds want to know? ...
You know, I used to really admire you, Lady, but you have taken a permanent bend from the swamp. It isn’t even worth trying to debate reality with you.
I hope you can remain safely in the swamp and away from reality.
“Soft body armor is now available that *can* stop some rifle fire without plates, FYI”
Do you have a source of this info? I own Level III AR500 plates but I’d be interested if something was a lot more flexible and covered more. I know there are Polyethylene inserts that are lighter. They are still plates (3 lbs/each) and expensive.
;-)
Didn’t find it. Still don’t understand the need for your straw man when this is an obvious case of justifiably shooting someone.
That would be the Dragon Skin and subsequent developments. Dragon Skin was flexible and would stop lower powered rifle rounds. Unfortunately, it was inconsistent against 7.62 AK and reportedly useless against 7.62x54R. However, it is still in production under different management and I’ve heard a revised version is going into production soon.
And aside from that, truly soft level III armor is coming - they’ve been making lots of progress with non-Newtonian fluids lately.
http://www.businessinsider.com/air-force-cadet-bullet-stopping-goo-for-body-armor-2017-5
https://www.popsci.com/poland-develops-bulletproof-liquid-armor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_Armor
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.