Posted on 11/11/2017 11:19:28 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Is it equality when ‘prominent’ wealthy Democrat donors from Hollywood abuse people sexually, including children, use their wealth to suppress the abused and witnesses, and the political left, media, and Hollywood turn a blind eye for decades - in part because the culprits are ‘good Democrats’ who make big donations?
Is it equality when access to Hillary and other Democrat politicians at ‘fundraising’ dinners cost $10s of thousands per plate (George Clooney paid reported $350,000 for a table at one such dinner)? Think they'd meet with voters at an Outback Steakhouse, for free?
Do most convicted pedophiles and sex offenders get to serve their ‘jail’ time under ‘house arrest’ in their own mansion in central Manhattan, like Jeffrey Epstein did? Is that equality?
There are many, many, many examples, because the left, if anything, are the champions of hypocrisy.
They use it, among other things, to cause division thru jealousy, hate, etc.
They are of their Dad, the devil. He comes to steal, kill and destroy. The RATs are one of his favorite tools.
Yes. I would add to that. The mentality of a liberal is "F' everyone else.".
Democrats created the inequality. They entice the bottom 50% into abandoning income (get paid to not work, income confiscated from those who do; entitlements & taxes), so there is diminishing wealth there. Those hyper-productive who can do the work of many (if by proxy) reap the income of many. Ergo inequality.
New Democrat slogan: ARRRRRRRGH!!!
And their flag is the Jolly Roger.
And legitimizing envy and covetousness. No wonder they hate the Bible.
Equality means “the same.” So they are saying that all should get the same amount of money? I’m for that, if it means george soros, bammy, hillary, algore and all the ruling elite have most of their money, property and investments taken away and redistributed to me and others who have supported them in their life style for years.
All of which candidates, incidentally, were very wealthy by American standards. For these the invocation of the immorality of inequity in material possessions is less a moral position than it is a very useful bit of political posturing: excite envy and yes, sometimes Paul will be delighted to see you rob Peter and pay him but more often Paul is perfectly satisfied just to see Peter robbed. Which is good because that's a much more prevalent outcome when you're dealing with social justice warriors, i.e. thieves.
I think it is because some days they want to turn america into nk and some days into Venezuela
Obsessed with becoming totalitarian. Correct but 2% understand this.
You think that few? Why would something so obvious be so obscure to so many?
In addition, those physicians are also *WORKING*. They are doing a job that is desperately needed, unlike the politicians, most lawyers, and similar who leech off society and do very little actual work.
I have far, far more respect for doctors, for you, for janitors, plumbers, carpenters, trash collectors and anyone else who is actually creating something or providing a service as opposed to just conniving about how to move money from our pockets into their pockets.
GREAT post.
I’m stealing it. That post should belong to me instead.
Our bankruptsy laws were based on those mosaic laws(note the every 7 years clause in our bankruptsy codes)
There may be, I bet you would never be audited over a mistake in their favor, regardless of size (Not that I've tried it).
So in 10 years that is about 35 to 45 Trillion dollars in gross receipts, yet they are hesitating in letting taxpayers keep a whopping 1.4 Trillion of those gross receipts over the next 10 years.
Thanks Tolerance Sucks Rocks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.