Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grania
There’s nothing in either bill that stops repatriated money from being used to line the pockets of upper-tier employees and owners and from using the money to buy out smaller competitors.

So you are now opposed to repatriating the earnings of U.S. companies that are parked abroad for tax reasons? Are you also opposed to shifting to a territorial taxation basis for corporate earnings? And why do you think it is any of the Congress' business what companies do with repatriated profits? If they pay it out to owners and top tier employees, that money will be taxed at individual income tax rates that are probably higher than the effective corporate rate that the company would otherwise have been paid. If they buy out smaller competitors, so what? Companies buy each other every day.

7 posted on 11/15/2017 3:20:19 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: sphinx
If they buy out smaller companies, so what?

I disagree. Individual and small businesses are what will bring back the middle class. Less regulations helps. Simpler lower takes for small business would help. The discrepancy between the income of the top 5% of the population and everyone else is appalling. Why should, for example, the Waltons, get any tax breaks that don't have to directly go into workers wages and nourishing small US companies? They got rich off the backs of employees who have wages that are so low that they're eligible for government benefits in many cases.

8 posted on 11/15/2017 3:32:55 AM PST by grania (Deplorable and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson