Your explanation needs a tiny bit of clarification. The judge's assistant used a stamp with the Moore's “signature” on it, and then initialed the signature so that anyone examining the document would know that the “signature” was made by a stamp used by his assistant.
Judge Moore presided over the divorce of the lady with the yearbook. Her divorce papers had his stamped signature on them. This rocket scientist used this “signature” to make a crude forgery and even included the judge's assistant's initials in her effort... The judge didn't have this assistant until 20 years after the yearbook was supposedly signed.
But you are right that the forged message didn't prove anything other than the two had apparently made contact. The funny thing is that because Allred was in such haste to get in on this circus she just collapsed the entire charade. I am wondering how the mainstream media will spin this?
Thanks for your additional clarification on post 66.