So what? They had a court order, and evidence that he was violating said order. And he was known to be violent towards his neighbors. So they just went home?
a madman on the loose while defending their decision not to arrest the man for previously violating a court order prohibiting him from having guns. “......
Seems rather obvious, the police had a good reason to confiscate those guns BEFORE that “madman on the loose” went on his shooting spree. Guess what all a moot point now.
So what? They had a court order, and evidence that he was violating said order. And he was known to be violent towards his neighbors. So they just went home?
Evidently there was no dog to shoot. Oh well. Off to the donut shop.