Judge Moore Ping!
Want on or off this ping list? Just drop me a FReep mail.
Nice roundup of the accusers and Judge Moore's responses.
Follow Judge Moore on Twitter.
Posted on 11/17/2017 8:05:09 PM PST by lasereye
Game over—Thank you for playing.
It’s official — signature is fake.
She said she got her book about a month after she turned 16 on Nov 14 1977. Does that make sense since the 1977 school year ended 5 months earlier.
She says he was such an important person...but he wasn't even appointed Deputy District Attorney until October of 1977.
About the "supposed" bruises on her neck....They would have been on the back of her neck. She said she covered them with makeup. Why??....she had long red hair.
So many lies.
Or did she know in advance and is part of the conspiracy/subterfuge?
Bookmark
LOL - The writer of this piece assumes that Moore wrote the entry in the yearbook but wisely did not sign it and only years later the woman added Moore’s forged signature and other identifying data. That’s even more far fetched than Allred’s statement that all the writing on the page was Moore’s. You can’t make this stuff up!
TILT....insert another quarter, er I mean, bimbo.
Want on or off this ping list? Just drop me a FReep mail.
Nice roundup of the accusers and Judge Moore's responses.
Follow Judge Moore on Twitter.
She was voluntarily blindsided.
Sue both those bishes.
Discovery will be entertaining.
And Allred loses her law license.
According to the President Clinton Rule, accusations of sexual misconduct are irrelevant.
Are you saying she was taken by surprise but has “voluntarily” gone along with it for the sake of mammon, fame, her reputation, something. Obviously she wouldn’t be the first attorney with a nasty surprise or more; the cleverest ones use their lawyerly tricks and roll right along. Am I on the right track?
Yeah that was a bit strange. It is interesting to see how people think .. or not think. Whoever wrote the note likely signed their name as Roy as the note and Roy are in the handwriting and ink. What was added in a different ink and handwriting was last name Moore, DA, date and location.
The yearbook evidence means nothing. Even if you somehow explain away the different ink and handwriting they can't prove Roy signed it and it wasn't forged. So we have a stand-off and a he said / she said. The voters have to decide.
Allred is intentionally not asking detailed questions to Beverly Young Nelson about the yearbook. Maybe Beverly did, or had someone do, the forgery/modification —- or maybe she didn’t. The person to ask would be the person/group that is paying Gloria Allred’s fees and Beverly’s expenses. And that paymaster/arranger is NOT BEVERLY
“It’s evidence?”
Yes, it certainly is evidence.
Evidence that Gloria Allred should be disbarred.
Well...bye, Gloria.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.