[Jim Noble]

Any State Legislature could limit or ban hunting tomorrow without even touching the second amendment.

What a retard.

[Ancesthntr]

“Any State Legislature could limit or ban hunting tomorrow without even touching the second amendment.

What a retard.”

---

No, quite to the contrary - he knows EXACTLY that this is the case, as do all other high-level gun control advocates. This is nothing new, BTW - in England in the 1600s, no one was allowed to “kill the King’s animals” without a permit, and basically none were given out. As such, no one needed a gun (or so the argument went). The 2nd Amendment was passed and ratified by men who knew of this history very well.

Someone may say to you, “You don’t need a 30-round magazine attached to a semi-automatic rifle to hunt deer.” The perfect response is as follows: “You know, you’re correct about that. On the other hand, the 2nd Amendment wasn’t written because the deer were coming.”

[Sasparilla]

...Any State Legislature could limit or ban hunting tomorrow without even touching the second amendment....

They already do that. They give that power to the natural resources, or fish and wildlife, or whatever the state calls them. They require licenses, rifle/shotgun capacity for hunting, limits on game taken, type of game taken, and the ability to close areas or species completely to hunting.