Posted on 11/22/2017 12:42:37 PM PST by Sub-Driver
She wasn’t in Washington then.
Don’t fall for this crap from the Demos/Media.
In 2000, didn’t they say “Aw shucks, we weren’t tough enough and doing our jobs holding Bill Clinton’s feet to the fire but, doggone it, we’ll get back to doing our jobs now.”
With George W Bush in office
Now they’re saying “Aw shucks, we should’ve reported harassment way back but, doggone it, we’ll get right back on it now.”
With Roy Moore and any other Republican out there
I think folks are missing the Dem strategy here.
Why are they going after BJ Clinton now? I suspect that they have decided to sacrifice him in order to set up impeachment of Trump. They need it to be BJ Clinton that is now declared a total reprobate since he was “impeached”. This allows them to then demand that Trump be impeached once they bring out, (parade), several new sexual assault victims.
Why are all of these high profile Dems now saying Clinton should have resigned 20 years later? To provide creds for the demand for impeachment if Trump refuses to resign or denies the “new” allegations?
I don’t trust the Dems. They don’t “eat” their own unless it will get them something more important.
They won’t get Trump on sexual abuse, molestation or rape. They are playing it as a fake moral equivalency game. They will try to equate Clinton’s rape charges with Trump’s locker room talk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.