editor-surveyor:
"Misdirection!
Your statement is completely false." No, it's a totally accurate analogy, your scorn not withstanding.
- In a murder case, for example, we start with a dead body.
In science we start with a living body.
- In a murder case we look for evidence of how & "who done it".
In science we look for evidence of how, assuming the Who.
- Using the evidence, in a murder case we form hypotheses on how & whom, then look for further evidence to confirm or falsify them.
Using the evidence, in science we form hypotheses on how (assuming Whom), then look for further evidence to confirm or falsify them.
- If our hypotheses are confirmed then in a murder case we file charges, while in science we publish findings (and for some: give thanks).
Same processes, regardless of editor-surveyor's scorn.
.
>> “In science we start with a living body.” <<
“We?”
Who is we? You have absolutely nothing to do with science!
You’re as fake as CNN.
The evidence, every bit of it, says evolution is impossible. That is especially so since the fullness of the DNA code is revealed. DNA is Yehova’s lock preventing “evolution” from destroying his creation.
Take your con game somewhere else.
.