It’s displays of pretentious asininity like this that typifies the intellectual duplicity that characterizes your co-apologists. As if an “abstract” (as opposed to a Wikipedia link) is not a standard feature OF EVERY PUBLISHED SCIENTIFIC PAPER.
I have no interest in refuting all the supercilious posturing you engage in so that we could actually have a substantive debate. I’m perfectly content to drop you into the category of “living examples of the veracity of Planck’s Dictum,” and call it a day.
Just to be sure I went back & reviewed your posts on this thread.
Without exception, your posts consist of complaints about "posturing", "not legitimate", "slight-of-hand", "rope-a-dope", "obfuscation", "pretentious asininity" & such.
You demand I lay out, in abstract, the case for abiogenesis, but refuse to read the short summaries I linked to which express my opinions better than any I could write.
Now, having exhausted your vocabulary of insult words, you now throw down a cloud of smoke about "Plank's Dictum" and, what, disappear from the stage?
Typical.