Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK
Abiogenesis is a weakly confirmed hypothesis, nothing more.

I provisionally agree.

The problem is you have no other alternative apart from Creationism.

153 posted on 12/03/2017 12:21:53 PM PST by papertyger (Bulverism: it's not just for liberals anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger
papertyger: "I provisionally agree.
The problem is you have no other alternative apart from Creationism."

Just in case you missed it before, I believe that God created the heavens, earth and everything on it, and that in the beginning was the Word, with God.
The question natural-science asks is: are there confirmed natural explanations for how God created?
The answer is: so far, not really, just a lot of very interesting hypotheses and experiments.

But many posters here have claimed these scientific hypotheses amount to "theories", "laws", "doctrine", "dogma" or even "religion".
That's all nonsense, so far they're just tentative ideas pending further research & analysis.

156 posted on 12/03/2017 3:37:01 PM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson