BTW, we are well familiar with the tactic of making a claim, then offering an undifferentiated “phone book” instead of a falsifiable argument.
If you can’t give a falsifiable summary, you are simply engaging in hearsay.
So, I take it you favor the type of scientific exactitude practiced by other posters here, this one, for example:
editor-surveyor post #30: "Pathetic pulp fiction, and nothing more."
Now there is a real scientific argument for you, in the same class as E=MC2 for it's brilliance & brevity, right?
</sarc>