Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CFPB Official Sues Trump Over Leadership Pick
Townhall.com ^ | November 27, 2017 | Leah Barkoukis

Posted on 11/27/2017 4:51:48 AM PST by Kaslin

A Consumer Financial Protection Bureau official sued President Trump on Sunday over his appointment of Office and Management and Budget director Mick Mulvaney to serve as interim director of the agency.

Leandra English filed the lawsuit late Sunday to block Mulvaney from taking over the CFPB, and asked for a declaratory judgment by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on the matter.

The federal official argues that the Dodd-Frank Act, a law championed by Democrats that created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, prohibits the White House from naming the director for the agency.

  English, who is the deputy director of the bureau, said she became the acting director of the bureau under the law after Richard Cordray, the now-former director, resigned last Friday.

Cordray was appointed by President Barack Obama and has been the subject to criticism from congressional Republicans who said he was overzealous.

The White House argued in an opinion issued Saturday by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel that it is within the president’s right to appoint an acting director. Steven A. Engel, newly confirmed head of the office, wrote that while the deputy director could serve as acting director under the statute, the president has the power to make appointments under the Vacancies Reform Act. (Fox News)

But English argues that provisions within the Dodd-Frank Act that lay out the agency’s line of succession override the Federal Vacancies Act.

“The president’s purported or intended appointment of defendant Mulvaney as Acting Director of the CFPB is unlawful,” the complaint reads, adding that the president’s use of the Federal Vacancies Act is “an obvious contravention of Congress’s statutory scheme” that “cannot be reconciled with Dodd-Frank’s mandatory language.”

White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the administration is aware of the lawsuit but there is no question the president was within his rights to appoint Mulvaney. 

"The Administration is aware of the suit filed this evening by Deputy Director English," she said in a statement to CNN. "However the law is clear: Director Mulvaney is the Acting Director of the CFPB. Now that the CFPB's own General Counsel - who was hired under Richard Cordray - has notified the Bureau's leadership that she agrees with the Administration's and DOJ's reading of the law, there should be no question that Director Mulvaney is the Acting Director.

"It is unfortunate that Mr. Cordray decided to put his political ambition above the interests of consumers with this stunt. Director Mulvaney will bring a more serious and professional approach to running the CFPB."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: cfpb; coup; lawsuit; leandraenglish; mickmulvaney; mulvaney; presidenttrump; richardcordray; trumpcfpb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 11/27/2017 4:51:49 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The federal bureaucracy is an executive branch unto itself now. A fourth branch of government.


2 posted on 11/27/2017 4:54:47 AM PST by madprof98 (N)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; Grampa Dave; RitaOK; stephenjohnbanker; HarleyLady27; MinuteGal; Jane Long; Black Agnes; ...
Obama fighting to keep control?....that's b/c he's got plenty to hide. Loser Hillary will be of no help (smirk).

Trump needs to find out ASAP what dirty work Obama and his COS were up to in the Treasury. His only interest as prez was tapping into the US Treasury....and gaming asst agencies. Read on.

REFERENCE ---- OBAMA GAVE RHAM EMANUEL TWO KEY JOBS Soon as they occupied the WH, Obama placed his COS Rahm Emanuel in control of the US Dept of the Treasury (oversees the IRS).

PAUSE TO REFLECT First-term Obama had tight control of Treasury; Obama calculatedly placed his then-COS Rahm Emanuel in a dual role.......in the WH and at Treasury. Obama had a stranglehold on Treasury via COS Rahm Emanuel's dual role

==========================================

THE SMOKING GUN---WSJ REPORT--On Jan 20, 2009 Timothy Geithner was appointed Obama's Secy of the Treasury. But within three weeks, the Obama White House tightened its grip on Treasury. Obama put his COS, Rahm Emanuel, in charge of Treasury---Rahm Emanuel's dual role was an unusual move.

When he got to Treasury, WH COS Rahm Emanuel was so involved in the inner workings that the phrase "Rahm wants it" had become an unofficial mantra among subservient govt staffers, prostrate in obeisance, scurrying to accede to Rahm's wishes, according to Treasury government officials. Reported by WSJ / 05/31/09

More here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124113406528875137.html

==========================================

Pres Trump needs to direct AG Sessions to make an inquiry to the US Dept of the Treasury...... and be sure to ask what RAHM AND Obama were doing in the US Treasury after Obama got elected.

Treasury HAS a huge Rahm/Obama paper trail. One can get awfully rich awfully fast knowing the Fed's Treasury moves in advance.

But the Iran connection could prove to be even more interesting considering the hundreds of millions Obama secretly gave to Iran.

3 posted on 11/27/2017 5:06:52 AM PST by Liz (Liberals are incapable of governing or practicing journalism in a normal American way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

4 posted on 11/27/2017 5:12:29 AM PST by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
What a stupid lawsuit. The Dodd-Frank act, , Title X, Subtitle A, Section 1011 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION, clearly states:

(b) DIRECTOR AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—There is established the position of the Director, who shall serve as the head of the Bureau.

(2) APPOINTMENT.—Subject to paragraph (3), the Director shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(3) QUALIFICATION.—The President shall nominate the Director from among individuals who are citizens of the United States.

And the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 says:

"(1) the first assistant to the office of such officer shall perform the functions and duties of the office temporarily in an acting capacity subject to the time limitations of section 3346;

"(2) notwithstanding paragraph (1), the President (and only the President) may direct a person who serves in an office for which appointment is required to be made by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to perform the functions and duties of the vacant office temporarily in an acting capacity subject to the time limitations of section 3346;

Clearly the President can appoint an interim director.

5 posted on 11/27/2017 5:23:07 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: GOPe Means Bend Over Spell Run

The technique is as the man said....... Obstruction of Governance.

Obstruction of governance is essentially sedition, the attempt to overthrow the sitting government.


7 posted on 11/27/2017 5:29:49 AM PST by Thibodeaux (whites seem to actually be supreme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Trump definitely has the better legal end of this argument.


8 posted on 11/27/2017 5:33:01 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is another example of the dems trying to run out the clock on the Trump agenda by cherry picking activist courts to file frivolous lawsuits in. They want to keep his policies from being implemented by tying them up in legal red tape.


9 posted on 11/27/2017 5:36:39 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I hope Mulvaney is at work this morning; and asking for resignations.


10 posted on 11/27/2017 5:48:29 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Because now un-elected federal bureaucrats will decide for themselves who their successors are - the taxpayers and their elected president can butt out.

Throw these parasites out and dissolve this bureaucracy.
11 posted on 11/27/2017 5:53:07 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaslin
"Leandra English filed the lawsuit."

But who's paying the lawyer's bill..?? That's the big question.......

13 posted on 11/27/2017 6:22:12 AM PST by unread (Joe McCarthy was right.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Now you see just how unaccountable the Marxist-Progressives intended the CFPB to be.

In addition to Dodd-Frank setting up internal self-succession of the chain of command, needing no new POTUS input once the first chairman was chosen (the chairman hand picks all the other officers under them), there is also:

no Congressional oversight whatsoever;

budget set by the CFPB itself with the right to just tell the federal reserve what funds it wants - and then gets;

scope & breadth of the CFPB mission set internally by the CFPB;

organization of the CFPB set internally by the CFPB.

It is a rogue agency and it’s part of Dodd-Frank should have been repealed lock, stock and barrel.

If Congress wants to pass some specific “consumer financial protection” regulation, and assign the regulatory oversight of that regulation to some federal agency, it is capable of doing so without the rogue CFPB.


14 posted on 11/27/2017 6:30:04 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Bring it on - Fauxcahontas Warren is unhappy. She helped create this UNACCONTABLE entity and designed it so the swamp could be in charge. Congress cannot even DEFUND the CFPB's activities!!! Reminds me of Obamascare and congress inserting the words "...as the Sect shall deem necessary...". I would argue the Congress does NOT have the Constitutional authority to assign IT'S responsibilities to the Article 2 Executive Branch.

IMHO this entire CFPB was set up with the goal of grabbing your "Private Property 401k's and IRA's" so they cannot pass to your heirs upon your death - the Govt sees trillions $$$ just sitting there.

The Feds Want Your Retirement Accounts, February 22, 2013

Nancy Pelosi Believes that All Money Belongs to the Government, March 8, 2013

A Leftist Lets It Slip: All Your Money Belongs To Government , 9/23/2015

On Nov. 20, 2007, Theresa Ghilarducci, professor of economic policy analysis at the New School for Social Research in New York, presented a paper proposing that the feds eliminate the tax deferral for private retirement accounts, confiscate the balance of those accounts, give each worker a $600 annual "contribution," assess a mandatory savings tax on every worker and guarantee a 3 percent rate of return on the newly titled "Guaranteed Retirement Accounts," or GRAs.

From the linked article above.
15 posted on 11/27/2017 7:06:01 AM PST by Cheerio (#44, The unknown President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Leandra English filed the lawsuit late Sunday to block Mulvaney from taking over the CFPB

************** Wonder if the CFPB is paying for her lawsuit? Liberals always get the taxpayers to pay for them.

16 posted on 11/27/2017 7:06:49 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Thanks for the informative post. Well done.


17 posted on 11/27/2017 7:08:38 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Let me get this straight. A bureaucrat in the Executive Branch sues the President who is, constitutionally, in charge of the Executive Branch claiming that the President doesn’t have the power to make appointments in the Executive Branch. An inmate trying to run the asylum. Madness.


18 posted on 11/27/2017 7:21:18 AM PST by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The CFPB is just another conduit to direct money into demoniacRAT coffers.

The law firm gets, at the very least, 33% of whatever the settlement is plus expenses. On a one billion dollar settlement, that means 333 million dollars for the law firm which then channels huge amounts of that money back into demoniacRAT politicians' pockets. The rest is distributed to millions of plaintiffs who receive a check for something like $9.32.

19 posted on 11/27/2017 7:45:27 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

All of these criminals who hate Free America are tiresome. Maybe it is time for dramatic measures to put an end to this nitwittery.


20 posted on 11/27/2017 8:00:50 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson