Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sgt_Schultze

Honesty in marketing helps.
This “up to N MB/s” is annoying. I get the article’s justification, but it still sucks: I want 25 MB/s when I want it, which really is probably when everyone else does too, so don’t promise fast when demand results in congestion. At least give options, like “N MB/s minimum with max Y MB/s”.

Whatever you do, I’m gonna be pissed if you start shaping my traffic based on my content and demanding more $ to get that performance back. Already ISPs are advancing plans to block “objectionable” content, which for some likely means Right-wing norms like FR.

Offer billing plans based on data rate & byte count, fine. Don’t shape content.


11 posted on 11/28/2017 8:03:24 PM PST by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2

Agreed. The example is one where the provider over-leverages his capacity in the hope that maximum aggregate demand never materializes. Everybody wants to minimize investment. But you’re right, in the end, something’s going to give way.


12 posted on 11/28/2017 9:10:05 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson