To: Oldeconomybuyer
National Science Foundation grants with the term "climate change" in the public summary are down 40 percent this year. Some scientists say they are avoiding the term, hoping to protect funding for their climate change research.Which suggests to me that for years these same people have added the term "climate change" to federal grant applications in much the same way a hunter adds doe urine as bait in order to attract federal dollars. Proving, again, that that these "climate change" scientific studies were nothing more than doe urine for federal dollars.
What a scam.
2 posted on
11/29/2017 8:59:15 AM PST by
Obadiah
To: Obadiah
Complete scam. You are totally correct.
To: Obadiah
Which suggests to me that for years these same people have added the term "climate change" to federal grant applications in much the same way a hunter adds doe urine as bait in order to attract federal dollars. The things one learns on FR -- I had no idea hunters add urine as bait in order to attract federal dollars.
6 posted on
11/29/2017 9:04:26 AM PST by
Maceman
To: Obadiah
Well said. Another way: asking these “scientists” if `global warming’ is real is like asking the ladies in the supermarket handing out samples on toothpicks if their product tastes good.
7 posted on
11/29/2017 9:06:36 AM PST by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all white armed conservatives)
To: Obadiah
EXACTLY how I interpreted this.
NPR is trying to form the narrative, though.
8 posted on
11/29/2017 9:06:45 AM PST by
Theo
(FReeping since 1998 ... drain the swamp.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson