Why can’t we state that on 1 January 2018 all entitlements and associated taxes are hereby administered by the respective states with a per capita distribution of existing resources.
Federal government will no longer offer, administer, or tax for social programs. The States can offer, administer, or tax as they feel for the same.
1.7-1.8 Trillion returned to the States for administration as they see fit. Cut Fed taxes to 10% flat across the board. No allowance for Federal bailouts of States, Territories, or other local government entities.
Then let those laboratories of democracy demonstrate which approach is actually best.
>
Why can’t we state that on 1 January 2018 all entitlements and associated taxes are hereby administered by the respective states with a per capita distribution of existing resources.
Federal government will no longer offer, administer, or tax for social programs. The States can offer, administer, or tax as they feel for the same.
1.7-1.8 Trillion returned to the States for administration as they see fit. Cut Fed taxes to 10% flat across the board. No allowance for Federal bailouts of States, Territories, or other local government entities.
Then let those laboratories of democracy demonstrate which approach is actually best.
>
1) This does nothing for any other further illegal/extra-constitutional power grab(s) by Fedzilla.
True, it should be done, but by declaring the likes contrary to A1S8, 9th/10th and any # of other Amendments.
2) It would also show the pleebs Fedzilla might not *NEED* to be even as big after the 10% ‘cut’....and we all know we can’t have Fedzilla being shown to be unnecessary /semi-s
3) Just the # of newly unemployed (as if they were ‘working’ to begin) would necessarily cause a great wave in the economy (might not be a bad correction, IMO).